The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]

---

List of Hot Black Singles number ones of 1986[edit]

List of Hot Black Singles number ones of 1986 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of Hot Black Singles number ones of 1986/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the latest in this series for your consideration. In this year another member of the most successful family in black music joins the list of chart-toppers..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EN-Jungwon

• Change Ref. to ((abbr|Ref.|Reference))

Support. That's all I got. -- EN-Jungwon 11:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@EN-Jungwon: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support There are a couple of photos of Dionne Warwick that are taken closer to 1986, which you could consider using. Besides that, I don't see problems in the text, table or images. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: - I went with one from the 70s...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47[edit]

• To be clear, this is more a clarification question than an actual suggestion, but why not use this Janet Jackson image for the lead? The list does use other black-and-white images, but the quality of this particular image is not the greatest. Again, not saying that you need to change it, but I was just curious.
• I am uncertain about "to date" in this part, (three times in his career to date). Per MOS:RELTIME, it is a word choice that is best avoided when possible. Would there a way to replace it with something else?

I only have two minor questions, and once they are both addressed, I will be more than happy to support this FLC for promotion. Great work as always. You really are an expert at making these types of lists. Aoba47 (talk) 03:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: - thanks for your review and kind words - both points addressed! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing everything. I support this list for promotion based on the prose. Best of luck with the FLC. Aoba47 (talk) 16:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14[edit]

• Image review: Passed
  • Images are relevant
  • Images are appropriately licensed
  • Images have alt text
• Source review: Passed
  • Reliable for the information being cited
  • Consistent date formatting
  • Consistent publisher formatting
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
• Support -- Pseud 14 (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the ((featured list candidates)) template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.