The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

---

List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1969[edit]

List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1969 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1969/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With 43 of these lists now promoted to FL status and one having multiple supports which will complete the 1970s, it's time to start on the 1960s, a far superior decade for country music in my humble opinion...... ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These aren't so much errors, but my personal preference

• Hot Country Singles, in 52 issues of the magazine - I would insert weekly after 52, it makes a little more clear
• In the issue of Billboard dated January 4 - I would reword it as "the January 4 issue", it's a little awkward
• which spent five weeks at number one, and his total of eleven weeks atop the chart in 1969 was the highest by any artist - I would split that sentence in two separate sentences
• his total of eleven weeks atop the chart in 1969 was the highest by any artist - You should clarify that. Was it the highest in 1969 or in the history of the chart? I would also say "cumulative" rather than total
• All three of James's chart-toppers - just James' per [2]
• If you wanted to expand the lede you could mention Tammy Wynette and Conway Twitty, as they both had two #1's that year.
• I hope those were helpful. It's a good article overall. ~ HAL333 00:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your comments, I have acted upon them. I haven't changed the bit about "issue dated January 4", as it almost certainly didn't actually physically come out on that date, and I think saying "issue dated January 4" is less ambiguous. Hope that's OK....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah, the January 4 thing makes sense now.
• Support Well done. ~ HAL333 15:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 13:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 02:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the ((featured list candidates)) template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.