The list was not promoted by User:The Rambling Man 14:33, 7 June 2008 [1].
It's pretty obvious why I put the list here, so I won't bore you with the details. Comment away. Noble Story (talk) 10:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
It looks good and all, and meets the criteria but I actually agree with GreenJoe. It's so small that it should be merged. Therefore I'm going to be Neutral on this one. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 08:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
** Yeah. It is good, and I don't want to knock what you've done but I don't believe that it fits as the best Wikipedia has to offer (from WP:WIAFL), rather it is just an easy list to produce because the scope is small. It would offer a whole lot more if this were moved to the Houston Rockets article. That's why I'm not opposing, because it is good, but I just can't support either. Hope you understand what I'm saying. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 06:35, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Changed my mind. Most head coach articles are fairly small lists. Well written, so Support
Changed my mind again. See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Cincinnati Bengals head coaches where Crzy and Redlands described it much more eloquently than I did here. Neutral until something is decided. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 08:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]