• Alt text needs to make it clear that the players in the photo are female.
  • Done.
• The caption is incomplete (no verb?) so no need for a full stop.
  • Done.
• "two representative teams" perhaps just me but what is the need for "representative" here, particularly in light of the detail that follows?
  • Done.
• "The women's variant of the game is very similar to the men's version, with minor modifications to umpiring and pitch requirements." - interesting indeed but I thought we avoided discussing items in the lead that don't appear, in greater detail, in the main article?
  • I believe this fits in with criteria #2, "...that introduces the subject...", especially to a reader without any knowledge of cricket. If consensus is that this shouldn't be part of the lead, I can remove it.
• Same for the next sentence, although I will admit that it makes the lead more interesting. Difficult.
  • Same response as above, I believe this fits in with criteria #2, "...that introduces the subject...", especially to a reader without any knowledge of cricket. If consensus is that this shouldn't be part of the lead, I can remove it.
• "formed.[4]The" space required after the reference.
  • Done.
• "The team's first series win was against New Zealand, in 1995.[8] The team is selected..." - odd follow-on, when the team won a series followed by how it was selected.
  • I've rearranged the paragraph with selection at the start, progressing to games played and then the wins.
• "by a panel of former cricketers" - male, female or both?
  • The BCCI guidelines don't say, but both panels since the rule was put in place were all-women. I have included the "retired women cricketers" in the panel composition as it is supported by that ref.
• "captain Jhulan Goswami.." - current or former?
  • Clarified as current.
• Jogelkar has a dash for 4WI while Basu has 0. This is the case for several other players. Why?
  • Dashes were used for players who did not bowl, while 0 is used for players who bowled at least one ball. Joglekar was an error, typed in a dash as I probably didn't think a keeper would bowl.
• "Batsman remained not out" - would we say "Batswoman"? Just checking...
  • Convention is to use batsman. Cricinfo and BBC use that term. Also this was discussed at WT:CRIC -- here and here.
• Jain seems initially out of order in the captain's table, if the original listing is supposed to be chronologically.
  • Fixed, an error with Chopra, don't know why I screwed that up.
• Don't think you need a total for years started and ended - not logical for me.
  • Removed, I provided it for context for the game stats, but agree that it seems odd.
• Dates in the references need to be in a consistent format - you have a mix of ISO and human-readable right now.
  • Fixed. The only place I've left the readable format is in Note 1 as I think it needs to be readable there.

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for your comments, hope I've addressed your concerns. -SpacemanSpiff 19:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Jogalekar's BBM is "0" while Basu's is – - inconsistent.
  • This was a dumb error, I was trying to fix the Joglekar error above, and entered it on the wrong column. Fixed now.
• Al Khadeer's Cricinfo profile indicates she's bowled at least one 4WI.

The Rambling Man (talk) 09:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Fixed Al Khadeer. There were a few other transcription errors that I did not catch while checking in my sandbox or in the article, and I have fixed them now, makes me feel like an ass. I'll contact the other editors who have already commented and let them know. Sorry for the trouble folks, there shouldn't be any more data errors. Please let me know if there are other concerns and/or changes you'd like to see. -SpacemanSpiff 19:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]