The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]

---

List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex[edit]

List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of Local Nature Reserves in Essex/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This list is in the same format as other featured lists of Local Nature Reserves, such as Hertfordshire and Buckinghamshire, and I hope it will also be found to meet the criteria. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Not sure why Essex is emboldened at the start of the lead. Changed to link. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] Convert the area into sq km or hectares or something appropriately metric. Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] Isn't Southend on Sea hyphenated? Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] "0.5 hectares" metric this time? Suggest consistent Imperial (metric) or the other way round. Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] " 75% of these are hornbeam..." shouldn't start sentences with numbers... Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] "The 8.5 long " missing a unit (and a conversion). Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] Any good reason that Pale Flax is capitalised thus? Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] That's about it this time round. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for the review. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] You're welcome. I'll cap and support in due course, just interested to see what other reviewers have to say... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support no major issues raised, I'm happy. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Many thanks The Rambling Man. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support lavishly illustrated, well-cited, all problems identified above fixed LavaBaron (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Why are we converting kilometer to miles? The subject is not American nor is this encyclopedia.

  Brits use miles. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Changed. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I am not sure if you need the initials under Keys to be bold.

• They are in bold in other similar lists and I think it is better to be consistent.

• The beginning of the description of the sites are quite repetitive. Most of them either begin with "This (site)" or "The (site)". I would rearrange.

• I will work on this. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I have amended to give more variety to the beginnings. Does it look OK now FrB.TG? Dudley Miles (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly better now.

• Why are the YES (under public access) in capital?

• Changed. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I think you might need to wiki-link the publishers in references (or not). It is up to you.

• I have never (or very rarely) wiki-linked publishers and I do not think it is usual. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is it. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC) PS if it is not too much to ask, could you perhaps consider posting at FLC for listings of Bradley Cooper's films?[reply]

• Many thanks for your comments FrB.TG. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support FrB.TG (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed- not linking publishers is unusual, but is not against any rules as long as you're consistent. Promoting. --PresN 17:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the ((featured list candidates)) template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.