The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 6 support, 0 oppose. Promote. MarcK 16:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Based off the layouts of the other featured lists at Wikiproject Football, but with some additional sections that I thought are relevant. I believe it meets the featured list criteria, but that's up to you to decide :) See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Central Coast Mariners FC players/archive1 for some relevant details, as that list was very similar to this; similarily, this may also be useful. Cheers, Daniel 23:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, the image suck at the moment. I'm working on it. Daniel 23:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update: When Danny Tiatto finally plays a match for QR (in the 2007-08 season, later this calendar year), I'll have a (very appropriate) image to add to the "Notable players" section, which Tiatto will feature in.

• Support as nominator. Daniel 23:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – though I'd like to see the "Appear'ces" column title written out in full, since table width doesn't seem to be an issue in this case. - Mark 06:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Y Done, that was a thing that I was meaning to change but forgot all about. Thanks! Daniel 06:13, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Quality Article. .....Todd^#661 09:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• A simple flag icon before the name wouldn't be more efficient than an entire column? I see that it's an issue with several of these lists and I think it is very, very unnecessary. -- Phoenix2 ^{(talk, review)} 15:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree that it would look better having, say, Ante Milicic, however this breaks the sort table for the "name" field, for some reason. Unless you can think of doing this another way, the only other option is to not list the nationality of the players, which I feel would be a considerable loss to the list, given this is a rapidly-diversifying club team. Daniel 07:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I suppose. Support for the time being, I'll ponder on this and see if there's a better solution. -- Phoenix2 ^(holla) 01:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • I really hope you can find one, because I agree with your comments that the current way the flags are listed isn't particularily effective. Daniel 07:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - would DoB be relevant? Blnguyen (cranky admin anniversary) 06:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Probably not, in my opinion, as I can't see what it'd add to the list in terms of making it more 'comprehensive'. Daniel 06:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I fully support this article becoming featured. It's well-referenced and the list itself is incredibly interactive and easily sortable. I actually plan on using the format of the list on an article that I'm working on. gaillimh^{Conas tá tú?} 04:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]