Comments
- "Spain's first truly national league" truly is redundant remove it
- "Real Madrid enjoyed a successful start" enjoyed isn't particularly encyclopedic I would change it to had
- "Real Madrid enjoyed a successful start in La Liga, finishing second in the competition's first season." I would move this to after the bit about the copa del rey
- "In the 1947-48 season" you need to use an en dash instead of a hyphen and is there no link to an article?
- "Real Madrid had finished" remove had its not needed
- "Real Madrid went on to win" this could be shortened to "Real Madrid won"
- "club in terms of domestic titles is the 1960s" its past tense so it should be was
- "managed to win" again won would be better
- "having achieved this performance" change to which it has done twice
- the 1955-56 link needs an en dash
- "being also the first ever winners of this tournament" change to and were the first winners of the competition
- "It also managed to win the first five editions of the European Cup, and as of today it is the most successful team of the competition, with nine titles (the last of them being won in 2002)" sentence doesn't read well change to Real Madrid won the European Cup five years in succession since its inception, it won the competition a further four times, the last of which was in 2002. Its nine victories is the record number of victories by any club.
- The links to the seasons redirect to the current page this needs fixing
- Please be explicit. I don't know what you mean here.AdrianRO talk 07:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Basically the links to any seasons articles should have the years at the start not at the end like they currently are, as at the moment they don't link directly to the page. NapHit (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Done.AdrianRO talk 15:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but this has not been done, the La Liga links still have the years the wrong way round. The champions league ones need en dashes instead of dashes between the years. NapHit (talk) 18:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. AdrianRO talk 09:51, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Real Madrid is the team with more European trophies than any other football team (12). That defenitely needs referencing as this list suggests otherwise
- Generally numbers over 10 need to be indicated in figures
- The Super Cup and Intercontinental Cup need linking in the lead
That's alot of comments to deal with and that's just the lead, the table also needs alot of work to get it up to scratch. Here's my comments for the table
- Firstly I would merge the two tables and just put dashes in the areas that are not affected by the early regional championships
- The referencing is a major problem for me is there not a book that covers the majority of Real's history which can be used.
- The top scorer columns are unreferenced as far as I can see
- reffed in column note. Sandman888 (talk) 23:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't need the RSSSF refs for every UEFA competition is there not a ref that covers Real's participation in competitions season by season?
- The table fails WP:ACCESS see MOS:DTT for more info
- Using Template:Football season start would solve the pint mentioned above and make the table sortable which is a must in my opinion
- Any idea how to make it sortable without using this template? Cause using this template means starting out from zero with the table, and that's hard job to do. And, as you can see, I am for a while the only one editing this article. AdrianRO talk 08:02, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If I were you I'd just use the template its easier, look at the Watford list and the Liverpool one to see how. Yes its a lot but all your doing essentially is translating the information over so it won't take that long. NapHit (talk) 18:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If your using colours there needs to be a symbol used alongside as well
- C and 1st are perfectly readable for the colourblind. Sandman888 (talk) 23:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Points total should not be bolded
- The first general ref should be removed it inly plots league position and doesn't provide any other information so its usually useless as a general ref
- Done. AdrianRO talk 15:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As a guide I would look at List of Watford F.C. seasons and List of Liverpool F.C. seasons for help on the table which is a major problem at the moment. The lead is not great either but it can be fixed fairly easily. As there are a number of problems I'm going to oppose for now but if the problems are cleared up I'll be happy to revise that. Cheers NapHit (talk) 23:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The Barcelona list was promoted a while ago and since then guidelines have moved on, as lists such as this now use sortable tables then future lists that are up for candidacy must follow suit. Its WP:POINT to say this list is featured list while mine is exactly the same. The fact is it was promoted a whil ago and the guidelines have moved on, there is nothing more to it. There was an issue about this sort of thing fairly recently see here where you can see the debate about the tables. NapHit (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nearly there a few more comments:
- The position column should be after the points column, this is standard practice in seasons lists in wikipedia, it looks weird having that column first, it should come after the results to represent how the season progressed
- You need to use † instead of using † per WP:ACCESS
- Also move the symbols next to the letter and superscript, an example would be:
W*
- Are you sure about this? Maybe just the symbol needs to be superscript, not together with the "W". AdrianRO talk 13:59, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You use C and F to represent champions and Finalists I would go for W and RU to instead. F makes it ambiguous in my opinion and as use Runner-up in the Key you should use the abbreviation, and as most lists concerning trophies refer to them as winner, I think you should use this.
NapHit (talk) 22:36, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|