- External links
- Using the links checker tool at the right, one ref leads to a dead link.
- Lead
- Among third basemen, Wade Boggs has won the most Silver Slugger Awards, with eight wins between the rival New York Yankees (two) and Boston Red Sox (six). -- Remove the the
- Removing either would make the sentence grammatically incorrect. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 23:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I mean the the before rival. Its not right to have it there.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 01:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Grammatically speaking, there is nothing wrong with that the. It is the article for both New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 11:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Same comment that I stated in the second base FLC, fix the formatting of your acronym use.
-
- That's not what I meant, see the other FLC.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 01:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Schmidt won the first five NL Silver Slugger Awards at third base from 1980, when he led the Philadelphia Phillies to the World Series, to 1984[5] before his streak was broken by Tim Wallach. -- When was it broken?
- Look in the list. It encourages the reader to move forward. It's also a matter of math for the reader; not every fact needs to be explicated, or there'd be no need for a list. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 23:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't have to be obnoxious with all your responses. How is it a matter of math when the reader doesn't even know when it was broken?--Best, ₮RUCӨ 01:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- My response was not intended to be obnoxious, but if you found it to be so, I apologize. As to the comment, it is explicit in the lead that Schmidt won five consecutive awards from 1980 to 1984. Since he did not win 6 consecutive awards, it can certainly be inferred that Wallach won in 1985. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 11:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 22:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rodriguez batted in 156 runs during the 2007 season as well;[7] the NL record is held by Castilla (144 RBI in 1998). -- This acronym was not spelled out before this.
Untrue. Paragraph 1. However, it's been expanded per MOS:ABBR. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 23:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, you meant RBI. Please clarify next time. Done. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 23:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No comment.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 01:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Clarify the most recent winners from both leagues.
- See my comment at the second base FLC. The table makes this clear, as do the images, for that matter, and the lead is certainly long enough. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 23:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, see mines then.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 01:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is still the only concern I have.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 22:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I give. Where would you suggest the addition? End of the first paragraph? I'd like to keep it the same since I'm following the same format for all of these winners' lists. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 22:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It usually goes at the end of the paragraphs, but in this context, I guess you can do that or find somewhere where it is suitable. If this bothers you, I'm guessing it won't hurt the list not to have it since you did a great job explaining the rest.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 22:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, done for all lists of winners by position that are completed so far, and they are covered by the general reference. Do you think I need to add a whole paragraph of most recent winners to the main article of the topic or is it OK the way it is? KV5 (Talk • Phils) 23:06, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tables and references check out up to standards.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 22:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|