The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:08, 20 August 2014 [1].

List of accolades received by Her (film)[edit]

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Her (film)/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): Sock (pka Corvoe) ^{(be heard)}_{(my stuff)} 18:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC), Cowlibob (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one from me and Cowlibob. We're nominating this for featured list because it meets the six criteria for a featured list. We welcome any and all constructive comments or criticisms, and are happy to make changes to better the article if required. Sock (pka Corvoe) ^{(be heard)}_{(my stuff)} 18:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Krimuk90

Something off about "The film follows Theodore Twombly (Joaquin Phoenix), a man who develops a relationship with a female voice "Samantha" (Scarlett Johansson) produced by an intelligent computer operating system." How about "The film follows Theodore Twombly (Joaquin Phoenix), a man who develops a relationship with Samantha (Scarlett Johansson), a female voice produced by an intelligent computer operating system"?
Would be nice to include the Best Picture Oscar nomination in the lead. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 05:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Good suggestions! I made both changes. Thank you! Sock (pka Corvoe) ^{(be heard)}_{(my stuff)} 11:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Well done, yet again. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 14:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support! Cowlibob (talk) 16:15, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Skr15081997

References 33 and 34 have dates in DMY format. They should be changed to MDY format to maintain consistency.--Skr15081997 (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Skr15081997: Good catch! Fixed now. Cowlibob (talk) 15:44, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Rotten Tomatoes page says the film received 226 reviews.--Skr15081997 (talk) 15:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Skr15081997: Corrected, thanks again. Cowlibob (talk) 15:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: No issues. Excellent work!--Skr15081997 (talk) 16:05, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support! Cowlibob (talk) 16:14, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from --Khadar Khani (talk) 18:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments— "The film follows Theodore Twombly (Joaquin Phoenix), a man who develops a relationship with Samantha (Scarlett Johansson), a female voice produced by an intelligent computer operating system. The film also stars Amy Adams, Rooney Mara, and Olivia Wilde." needs an in-line citation. Are you sure the table has 109 entries? Ref. in the table should be Ref(s). Be consistent while formatting dates in the ref. Khadar Khani (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply] @Sahara4u: Added in line citation. Double checked numbers, 109 entries but had incorrect entry which I fixed. Ref(s) now. Fixed date format issue. Anything else? Cowlibob (talk) 15:44, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from --Khadar Khani (talk) 18:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments—

"The film follows Theodore Twombly (Joaquin Phoenix), a man who develops a relationship with Samantha (Scarlett Johansson), a female voice produced by an intelligent computer operating system. The film also stars Amy Adams, Rooney Mara, and Olivia Wilde." needs an in-line citation.
Are you sure the table has 109 entries?
Ref. in the table should be Ref(s).
Be consistent while formatting dates in the ref.

Khadar Khani (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sahara4u: Added in line citation. Double checked numbers, 109 entries but had incorrect entry which I fixed. Ref(s) now. Fixed date format issue. Anything else? Cowlibob (talk) 15:44, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Meets the standards! --Khadar Khani (talk) 18:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support! Cowlibob (talk) 22:47, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 00:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from AB01 "At the 71st Golden Globe Awards" Do we need two refs for "Austin Film Critics Association" awards? Either one would suffice alone 2nd place winnings for "Central Ohio Film Critics Association" are unsourced. I would suggest you use this AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 04:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply] @AB01: Fixed all three, thanks for the source. Anything else? Cowlibob (talk) 07:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply] more comments... Los Angeles Film Critics Association-->The film was also runner up for Music score No source for Online Film Critics Society's Best Original Screenplay win No source for Rome Film Festival's Best Film nom Ref #42 doesn't say anything about the film's nominations St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Association (Best Art Direction)-->It should be mentioned that they were runner-up for this award, as per the source Also, don't forget to update the awards/noms tally as per these comments ^^ AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 08:45, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply] @AB01: All rookie mistakes. Dealt with them all. Ref 41 now has nominations. Rome film festival source I've added says it was in competition which means that it would have been nominated for Best Film. Cowlibob (talk) 12:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 00:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from AB01

"At the 71st Golden Globe Awards"
Do we need two refs for "Austin Film Critics Association" awards? Either one would suffice alone
2nd place winnings for "Central Ohio Film Critics Association" are unsourced. I would suggest you use this AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 04:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AB01: Fixed all three, thanks for the source. Anything else? Cowlibob (talk) 07:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

more comments...

Los Angeles Film Critics Association-->The film was also runner up for Music score
No source for Online Film Critics Society's Best Original Screenplay win
No source for Rome Film Festival's Best Film nom
Ref #42 doesn't say anything about the film's nominations
St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Association (Best Art Direction)-->It should be mentioned that they were runner-up for this award, as per the source
Also, don't forget to update the awards/noms tally as per these comments ^^ AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 08:45, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AB01: All rookie mistakes. Dealt with them all. Ref 41 now has nominations. Rome film festival source I've added says it was in competition which means that it would have been nominated for Best Film. Cowlibob (talk) 12:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Can't find anything else wrong. Good job! AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 00:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support! Cowlibob (talk) 12:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment Is the disambiguator in the title entirely necessary? Similar lists (e.g. for Avatar, Precious, Ratatouille and Up) omit having "(film)" in the title, and List of accolades received by Her redirects here anyway. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 23:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@A Thousand Doors: I agree it's probably best to have the article as just "Her" as to my knowledge there is nothing that it could be confused with. I think a move should be considered after this nom has finished as it can be confusing for whoever does the bot's work as there'll be different article names. Do you have any other suggestions to improve the list? Cowlibob (talk) 19:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@A Thousand Doors and Cowlibob: It was agreed that film accolade lists should include their film's disambiguation tags. Please see this discussion for more details. Technically, we should have moved all of your examples after this discussion. Sock (~~tock~~ talk) 15:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, some of these rule changes need to be put in more prominent places than discussions that not all of us were part of. Cowlibob (talk) 13:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that. I'm not really sure where it would belong. Sock (~~tock~~ talk) 15:26, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the ((featured list candidates)) template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.