The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 07:12, 11 April 2009 [1].

List of awards and nominations received by Sheryl Crow[edit]

Nominator(s): Another Believer (Talk)
Toolbox

I am nominating this awards list for FL status because I believe it qualifies. I have created several similar awards lists that have reached FL status, so I am aware of the expectations and I hope this one can join the others. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 03:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The list is generally from the overall look FL quality but: Rock on the Net is not considered a reliable source Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_25#Rock_On_The_Net. This a lot of work I think to find the right sources for something like that.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Really? That's a shame. I have seen Rock on the Net used on many of the featured awards lists, and I did not have trouble using the site for the other awards lists I created. However, I appreciate the feedback, and I will start looking for alternative references. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 18:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Rock on the Net is no longer used as a reference. --Another Believer (Talk) 20:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for your feedback. Actually, I would like to get some additional feedback on this issue. I am aware of what method other articles use, but I wanted to see if this template would be accepted. For a chart with 32 nominations, I think the Ref. column allows the reader to be directed to a specific entry's source, as opposed to simply having to guess which reference at the end of the paragraph pertains to a particular entry. If other reviewers wish to see the Refs at the end of the paragraph, I can certainly fix that ASAP. I just thought it made the article look more organized, and it was easier for the reader.--Another Believer (Talk) 22:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Before I review, I would like to say that I agree with this new format because having like 32 refs at the end of a paragraph is just overkill.--₮RUCӨ 02:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk)
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
  • "Compilation and specialty albums"-->Her compilation and specialty albums
Done.
  • "C'mon C'mon which"-->C'mon C'mon, which
Done.
  • "Crow has been nominated two times."-->Crow has been nominated twice.
Done.
  • "the MTV Video Music Awards is now a respected pop culture awards show in its own right. " Source? Dabomb87 (talk) 15:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Phrase removed--unnecessary. Done.

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is/Are there any WikiProject(s) that this list could go under? Dabomb87 (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. WikiProject Country Music seems to fit best. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the changes to the FL criteria, I still believe this article warrants being a stand-alone list. Therefore, my support stands. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
More