• I don't think that the country name is needed in the venue column.

• Removed.

• Why is the width length predefined? ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 10:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• What do you mean? I don't understand you.

• Why have you set the widths for the columns? It seems to mess up the things. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 14:33, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• How does it mess things up for you? The Rambling Man (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The sentence "Despite making his first T20I appearance in 2006" is a little POV. Many players made their T20I debut in 2006 but didn't scored a century as a T20I century is rare.

• This is not about other cricketers, this is just about him.

♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 10:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• But this is somewhat a criticizing sentence and is a possible BLP violation. In case if an another publication has used this, it should be include in the references. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 14:33, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Removed "despite". The Rambling Man (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. Zia Khan 15:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The second sentence of the second para is a little confusing. Instead of repeating England once again, rephrase the sentence like "during the same series" or something of that sort.
  • Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Pos. for his second Test hundred is 2.
  • Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Senwes Park Potchefstroom -> Senwes Park, Potchefstroom
  • Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Sir Vivian Richards Stadium is in which city?
  • Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Unbeaten doesn't sound encyclopedic.
  • It's standard cricket language. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Someone who is unfamiliar with cricket might not clearly understand. Even hard-core cricket followers get confused between a batsman staying unbeaten till the end of the innings and carrying the bat at times. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 13:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Ok, -> not out. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• His 58-ball century is actually ninth in the list.
  • Fixed, unbelievable error on my behalf. Sorry. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• He has scored centuries while leading the team too.
  • Really? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Found and fixed, key sorted too. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still missing one. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 13:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Care to tell me which one? The Rambling Man (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • His 12th ODI hundred. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:02, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
          • That seems to be already noted? The Rambling Man (talk) 17:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Sort the cats alphabetically.
  • No need, where is that required? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Pardon me, there is no such rule. Just got this idea when a couple of editors reviewing my lists asked me to do the same. However, the relevant guideline says that it's quite essential to sort them in such a way that most significant categories appear first. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 13:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Do you think they're not in significant order? If not, perhaps you should suggest the order you'd prefer. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • I was just highlighting that. The word significance is highly subjective in these type of lists. The present order looks fine. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:02, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
          • The categories are already in alphabetical order, aren't they? Zia Khan 21:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm pretty much sure that SAF lost the game where he made 114* against India. Check for others too.

• While there are a few errors in the table which wouldn't take much time rectifying them, the prose is really not so engaging. It's not so good as we expected from you when compared with other lists. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok, done all the above (bar the cats comments, if there's a policy which says we need them alphabetical, then please show me, otherwise, no reason to change), but will also look at tweaking the lead to impress you further. Thanks for your comments! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vesantry, anything more? The Rambling Man (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for your c/e (lede). —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 03:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comments

• As of February 2013, he has scored 13 Test centuries -> he has scored 15 Test centuries.
• In his fifteen ODI centuries, De Villiers has scored the ninth-fastest century, you mean to say that this was the ninth fastest among his fifteen ODI centuries?
  

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 04:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Fixed both! Zia Khan 23:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]