The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 22:23, 11 August 2009 [1].


NWA Mid-Atlantic Heavyweight Championship[edit]

Nominator(s): Truco 503 23:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well here it is...the NWA Mid-Atlantic Heavyweight Championship. This is one of the oldest championship lists that have come here recently and one that is no longer in existence, so it was interesting to expand and should be an interesting read. Now bear with me, this took a lot of hard work to expand, and because the Jim Crockett Promotions is no longer in existence, I was limited in resources. So luckily I found the Mid-Atlantic Gateway which keeps records of all the titles and history of the company through research in newspapers, old advertisements, and other reliable party sources, which is verifiable and not speculation, so it should come across as a reliable source. Disclaimer: This is one confusing title history. Thanks for the reviews!--Truco 503 23:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) Ah well, we can deal with that later. Here are the dabs (you know the subject, so it's better if you fix them):

Resolved comments from MPJ-DK
Lead
  • "a prime reason why its championships included "Mid-Atlantic" in their names." A "prime reason why" doesn't read right with me, how about simplifying it by saying "which is why all JCP Championships all include "Mid-Atlantic" in their names"
  • "In 1970, the championship was introduced (under the name "NWA Eastern Heavyweight Championship")" Do we need the parenthesis? How about "was orginally introduced as the NWA Eastern Heavyweight Championship"??
  • "on a taping" => "during a taping"
  • "On the September 6, 1973 taping of Championship Wrestling,[Note 2] to coincide with JCP's alternate name of Mid-Atlantic Championship Wrestling", I'm not even completly sure what you're trying to say here.
  • I reworded it, is that better?--Truco 503 16:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Barry Windham worked as Krusher Kruschev? That's wrong, they defeated Koloff and Kruschev so the Krusher note should just be removed.
  • "and handed it to Crockett, Jr.", I'd use "belt" instead of "it" since that's the physical representation of the championship.
  • "The title was deactivated afterwards for unknown reasons by Crockett, Jr., and eventually, JCP was sold to Ted Turner in 1988.[3]" may I suggest "Jim Crockett, Jr. deactivated the championship for unknown reason, and eventually JCP..."
  • "Their prime championship, called the MACW Heavyweight Championship,[4] as a result, has no connection to this original JCP/MACW championship." I'd move "As a result" up first in the sentence.
  • "in arenas or television studios" As opposed to?
  • I changed it to and, maybe that will help.--Truco 503 16:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Table
  • With Pat O'Conners' title reign being fictious would it make sense to actually not give it a number and start with 1 for the Misouri Mauler? Just wondering.
  • The thing is, he is credited as actually being the champion, who are we to say he wasn't? If JCP said he was champion, then that's what he was. Just because it was a storyline reign, doesn't mean we shouldn't add it.--Truco 503 16:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think that it'd look better if all the numbers in the second # column were on the same line and not underneath each other.
  • On my browser they are all on the same line, I added +1 digit to the width, how is it now?--Truco 503 16:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • N/A shouldn't sort by "N" but be either first or last in the sort order, I've done it by using ((sort|-|N/A)) to get it to sort as "missing data" and not data called "N/A"
  • Black Bart sorts by "Bart", but that's not his last name, should sort by "Black", it's not a "first name" "last name" name but more of a title
  • Iron Sheik should sort by "Iron" not "Sheik", as above.
  • Johnny Valentine's 1st reign sorts like it's between 66 and 69 days but the note states 402 days
Combined reigns
  • I've been told that "The exact length of at least one title reign is uncertain, the shortest possible length is used." should be "The exact length of at least one title reign is uncertain, so the shortest possible length is used." instead.
  • Sorting as above.
  • The ordering of the tied reigns, in each case it's got a confirmed length and a "minimum length", I'd put the one with the potential to be longer as the first one, so Koloff before Brunzell and Slater before Atlas.
Footnotes
  • #1, should be "on which" not "In which"
  • Notes 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 13 should all be worded "The exact date on which"
Sources
  • Thanks for looking. I addressed all your comments, and specifically commented on the ones which I could not/had trouble addressing. Thanks again!--Truco 503 16:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk)
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
  • "a territory-promotion governed by the National Wrestling Alliance (NWA) promotion." Can we fix the repetition of "promotion"?
  • "had defeated defending-champion Pat O'Connor in New York" Is the city not known? Remove the hyphen and insert "the" before "defending".
  • "promotion, nevertheless," Comma after "promotion" should be a semicolon.
  • "of it being a fictitious reign."--of its being a fictitious reign.
  • That is not correct, it does not sound right when you read it -> Further information regarding O'Connor's reign is unavailable as a result of its being a fictitious reign.--Truco 503 15:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, the current noun + -ing is ungrammatical; using the possessive is correct. See this. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I reworded, how does it look?--Truco 503 16:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "this coincided with JCP beginning to be promoted as Mid-Atlantic Championship Wrestling."-->this coincided with JCP's beginning to be promoted as Mid-Atlantic Championship Wrestling.
  • JCP's beginning isn't right because they did not have a beginning of being promoted its just that they began to be promoted.--Truco 503 15:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, the noun + -ing structure is ungrammatical. Please rephrase. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I reworded, how does it look?--Truco 503 16:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "During this change" I assume the change wasn't gradual, so it should be "At the time of this change"
  • "a group of promoters were given permission" One group, so "was".
  • "there were 60 reigns among 29 wrestlers" "among"-->shared between
  • "second-highest"-->second-most
  • "length, at 504 days with two reigns; Patera ranks second, at 495 days with four reigns." Per WP:MOSNUM, comparable quantities should be written in the same way, so make the numbers all words or all numerals.
  • "televised events which aired"-->televised events that aired
  • Can you center the em dashes in the key? Dabomb87 (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • All done, except were I commented. Thanks for the review!--Truco 503 15:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (17–14) 21:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Glaring redundancy here: "the promotion was also promoted as...".
  • I don't think Garvin's first name needs repeating in the lead, though this is a minor point. Also, Jerry Brisco's first name repeats in one of the table's notes, as does Garvin's.
    • Fixed. Could you be exact as to where Brisco's name is repeated in the notes?--WillC 02:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Brisco's name repeats in the note for reign 15, the first under the new name. Garvin's repeats in the final reign's note. Giants2008 (17–14) 15:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • All fixed.--WillC 08:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comma before reference 4?
  • "Overall, there were 60 reigns shared between 29 wrestlers, all of which occured in the United States in arenas and television studios." Wouldn't it make more sense to say the titles changed hands during shows?
  • "Each reign was won at JCP promoted events". This strikes me as a bit awkward. How about "Each reign began at JCP-promoted events".
    • Fixed.--WillC 02:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • I like the "All title changes" bit, but I'd still like to see a hyphen for "JCP promoted". Giants2008 (17–14) 15:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • All fixed.--WillC 08:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jerry Brisco linked twice in the lead. Also two broadcast delay links, though one of them is piped.
    • Fixed. Considering it is pipelinked in one of them, I wouldn't say that is overlinking.--WillC 02:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note for reign 51: Contraction to be fixed (it's). Same for reign 56.
    • Fixed, I believe.--WillC 02:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Don't want to be a pain, but the "its" doesn't look that great without the apostrophe. Perhaps "it is" would work better? Giants2008 (17–14) 15:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • All fixed. You aren't a pain, grateful for all comments, no matter what they are.--WillC 08:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Footnote 12: Semi-colon after "television markets".
  • En dash needed for page range in reference 3. Giants2008 (17–14) 23:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Looks as good as the other wrestling title lists I've seen. Giants2008 (17–14) 21:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.