The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 21:17, 6 July 2009 [1].

---

WWE Backlash[edit]

Nominator(s): Samgibbs (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Featured list candidates/WWE Backlash/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that it meets the FL criteria quite well. It is fully referenced and is presented and laid out to Wikipedia standards. Samgibbs (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose: Not a list article. It should be taken to GAN.--WillC 18:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Not a list. Agree with Will, should be taken to Good Article Nominations should be taken to peer review. Bmg916^Speak 18:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I also agree that this is not a list hoever I recommend it go to Peer review prior to submission to GAN. I think that the article needs a little more content and the wording needs to be tightened up a little. Some of the sections seem choppy. Also:
• I ran this article through AWB and made a small change to a reference.
• There are no DAB links.
• There are several dead links that generate 404 errors that need to be fixed. --Kumioko (talk) 04:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose it's an article and really needs work before being submitted for Good Article, I second the comment about "Peer Review", I've been helped greatly by it. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose This is not a list, and not ready to be featured to say the least. AfroGold - Afkatk 17:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Snowy Oppose/Close-Suggest withdrawal -- In this format, it is not a list nor does it meet WP:WIAFL. In addition, it suits better over at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, though it needs work.--Truco ₅₀₃ 00:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.