The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gossip PKM.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shaidar cuebiyar (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

Your claim of this image being very similar one and small differences from the other miss the purpose of the two images. The album was released in Australian & New Zealand markets in 1986 as by Paul Kelly & the Coloured Girls (shown clearly in first infobox image). Due to possible racist connotations the band changed their name to Paul Kelly & the Messengers upon the 1987 international release (shown clearly in the second infobox image). Whilst a text description is provided, a visual image is necessary for North American and European casual readers to quickly become aware that this is the album they are looking for. I believe the images are not very similar as the differences are major in that they show an album which has been released under two different band names.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The images are almost identical - the changes can be described with the text "for the 1987 North American/European release, the image and text shading were changed slightly and the bands name was changed from The Colouredgirls to The Messengers". Showing that things are different is not a justification for non-free images, we must assume that people viewing the article can exercise a modicum of imagination. - Peripitus (Talk) 00:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#3a; multiple images are used where one would suffice as it does not add significant information. — Σxplicit 07:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, both are not needed to fully identify and understand the article. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SoRedTheRoseCD.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Feduciary (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:12, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Between the Buttons-US.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Muisc (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Sylvian-Brilliant Trees Words With The Shaman (album cover).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BNutzer (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Songsforpolarbears2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Suede67 (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rupaul - Supermodel of the World alternate cover.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kekkomereq4 (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences (background colour changed to white + some text added) from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment How does it fail Wikipedia:NFCC#1? The copyright to the cover is likely owned by either the artist or the Label. I highly doubt there is a free version of it.--Rockfang (talk) 02:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It fails NFCC#1 as this image can be described as "for the Alternative album the blue patterned background was changed to flat white" .... there we have a non-free image replaced with a free alternative....text. It is not necessary to illustrate everything, text and imagination are wonderful replacements - Peripitus (Talk) 08:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, both album covers are not needed to fully identify the album and fully understand the article. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RM Vuelve2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by David Pro (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image (zoomed in on his face and non-image elements rearranged) can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:21, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DuranDuran Carnival2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Feduciary (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pgs2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fantailfan (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Age To Age Word cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Supertrouperdc (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soulcadillac1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Skibz777 (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wvamtpmc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fantailfan (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pg42.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fantailfan (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ITSISK.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Das Ansehnlisch (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KravitzLLR20thAnniversary.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by GreekStar12 (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madonna - Bedtime Stories - front.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mlenooo (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABBA Ring Ring.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Supertrouperdc (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABBA - The Album (UK).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dreamer.se (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:5colours7inch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hipj1984 (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Carthy First Album Topic Reissue Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Teambb1 (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Carthy First Album Fontana Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Teambb1 (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Music tour edition.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Justaduckyguy (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finally Woken Australian Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Billy4kate (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bmtldvd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Armando12 (notify | contribs).

• extra non-free image in an article with an existing very similar one. The small differences from the other non-free image can easily be described with text alone if required. Image fails NFCC#1 (replaceable with a free alternative) and NFCC#3a (excessive use of non-free content) Peripitus (Talk) 00:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuinnessMan2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Philip Guiver (notify | contribs).

• Orphan file with uncertain copyright status. Image was used only on an autobiographical entry, deleted multiple times, uploaded by a now-banned user. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Michael Jonathan Guiver. Claim of fair use of Guinness logo uncertain; Wikimedia Commons did not buy the fair use claim and has deleted their version of the file. Hairhorn (talk) 03:59, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meon3.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Whophd (notify | contribs).

• The logo is for a competition to be hosting shows on ABC3 and not of the channel itself. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 05:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Logo has been moved. Usage has been changed now.Whophd (talk) 07:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I don't see why this is needed in the current article. Only one brief paragraph is given to the competition, and there is certainly no critical commentary about its logo. Fails various WP:NFCC criteria, particularly #8. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1229620drawingofself.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LaPearla (notify | contribs).

• User hasn't edited since '08 (to upload this file); has no encyclopedic use or value. ^blurred_peace ☮ 05:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:177398237 l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Saint Malice (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, unencyclopedic file that has no foreseeable value. ^blurred_peace ☮ 06:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008-02-25-84054.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rubzie Biggz 13 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, unencyclopedic, file with no foreseeable use. ^blurred_peace ☮ 06:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penn State Seal.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Meganfoxx (notify | contribs).

• Used only on an article about a campus, which it does not represent- it represents the university as a whole, but the university article is better illustrated by other images. As such, this file is not required, and should be deleted per the non-free content criteria. Its only use is purely decorative. J Milburn (talk) 13:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• DElete - should be replaced with a free image of the Worthington Scranton campus. - Peripitus (Talk) 04:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and use on the appropriate article: it is relevant and appropriate for the university article regardless of other images that may be there. DGG (talk) 16:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changing my deletion reason - I've orphaned this file as it was redundant to File:Pennsylvania State University seal.svg which is now used in the main and this subsidiary article, inclusion then being an editorial matter. Delete this image as redundant. - Peripitus (Talk) 00:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rattrap-manga.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mathewignash (notify | contribs).

• The manga version of the character is only mentioned in passing. The use of a non-free image is not justified. J Milburn (talk) 13:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - being decorative or copyrightholder's not objecting are not reasons to host non-free images - fails WP:NFCC#8. - Peripitus (Talk) 12:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheetordinobotrattrap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mathewignash (notify | contribs).

• This file really adds nothing to any of the pages on which it is used. In each, it is redundant to the lead image, but also shows other characters, which does not help the article at all. J Milburn (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• It shows a scene. Please keep in mind that long articles with little images are not an enjoyable read.--Gonzalo84 (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • That may be true, but this is the free encyclopedia and we should think long and hard before using non-free content. Stifle (talk) 09:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Exactly, it's free, and this is a single frame of what appears to be the lead in to the show, as well as being used in promotional materials including commercials. So doesn't the fact that the image is on these pages result in free advertisement for Hasbro products? (i.e. I don't really think Hasbro nor anybody else really cares about this slice of image on here.) Arc Lamps & Signal Flares (talk) 12:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Nominator's concerns addressed, now tagged as fair-use. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Infernominicon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mathewignash (notify | contribs).

• Toys are copyrightable. This image is non-free. J Milburn (talk) 14:18, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Nominator's concerns addressed, now tagged as fair-use. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starscream-machinewars.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mathewignash (notify | contribs).

• Toys are copyrightable. This image is non-free. J Milburn (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I thought they were when I uploaded it, but then I heard they were non-free 3D artwork owned by the toy company. So I changed the liscensing to non-free 3 image. Mathewignash (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete all. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stirling slenderman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)- uploaded by Apsouthern (notify | contribs).

File:Grossman3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)- uploaded by Apsouthern (notify | contribs).

File:Brazil16.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)- uploaded by Apsouthern (notify | contribs).

File:Der Ritter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)- uploaded by Apsouthern (notify | contribs).

These images have several problems. All four were uploaded in support of Slender Man, which as far as I can determine is a hoax (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slender man).

• In three out of the four cases, the uploader explicitly described the image as "fake".
• The first image contains a watermark that clearly contradicts the uploader's claim that xe is the rights holder, making the copyright licence given fraudulent.
• The descriptions in Slender Man contradict the uploader's statement of being the rights holder. The fourth image, for example, is described in the article as the creation of one "Hans Freckenberg", but described in the copyright licence as the uploader's own work.
• It's close to impossible to obtain correct information about the second and fourth images. They may well be genuine woodcuts. But there's no evidence of a "Hans Freckenberg" (or even a "Halstberg Castle") that I can find, so they are certainly not as they are described. Only the first image, from its watermark, is likely to be fully identifiable, including author and copyright licensing. The third image, of paintings in Serra da Capivara National Park, has an identifiable subject. But it's going to be tricky to identify the real photographer, and what copyright licence it is actually published under.

It's not beyond the bounds of possibility for an editor who places falsehoods in article space to be misrepresenting the ownership, descriptions, and copyright status of the articles uploaded in support of that content. Uncle G (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:250px-The Low Countries.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arriusjensen (notify | contribs).

• Low res version of a detailed map. I suspect this image has been taken from elsewhere without permission. J Milburn (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• A very similar, but not identical (although could have easily been made from), map occurs at http://personal.redestb.es/naoero1968/lowcount.htm 2ndAmendment (talk) 14:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, valid fair-use. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forbidden Science.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jbolden1517 (notify | contribs).

• The image is a promotional show that is used to highlight three characters. Per the NFCC #1, the image has to significantly increase the readers understanding of the topic, which this particular shot - three women standing next to each other - does not. NW (Talk) 15:49, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The 3 characters highlighted are the 3 female stars. This is image and the cloning image [1] are the ones that Cinemax and Dangerous Tomorrows are using to promote the show. I don't know of any reliable sources which are not focused on the female leads. If you watch the opening sequence you'll see those 3 featured prominently. One of them is almost always on screen during the show. It is a photo for a TV show showing the 3 main characters in costume. jbolden1517^Talk 16:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, seems in line with all our policies to me. – Quadell ^(talk) 19:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep reasonable explanation for why it is needed. DGG (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mis-Teeq Scandalous US.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patyo1994 (notify | contribs).

• Rerelease is not mentioned, let alone its cover. This non-free image is not required. J Milburn (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as failing NFCC#8, 10(currently) and possibly 3. There is no discussion of this piece of non-free content at all, not even a mention that there is a re-release, and this image adds nothing of significance to reader's understanding. The rationale is incorrect and not written for this item alone in that it states that the purpose is, in part "to show the primary visual image associated with the work" which is untrue as there is already a primary image for the article. Personally I see this as failing NFCC#3 as a single image is all that is required for me to illustrate the article, though I know that other's disagree with this and assert instead that each and every release requires an image else reader understanding will be damaged - Peripitus (Talk) 02:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belle secret diary intertitle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Patyo1994 (notify | contribs).

• I fail to see why an image of the intertitle is required on a list of episodes. This seems to be a purely decorative use. J Milburn (talk) 16:18, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.