The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCN2539.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yagneshwara_dasa (notify | contribs).

• orphan, no description, bad name, never used in an article. What or where is this? – Quadell ^(talk) 00:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Moved to Commons

File:Purple4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Neelix (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This image has been uploaded as part of an ongoing species identification effort at this location. It should not be deleted; its scientific name should be identified and then it should be transferred to the Commons with the scientific name as its title. Neelix (talk) 16:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I see. Perhaps you should move these all to Commons, adding them to the Commons:Category:Unidentified plants? – Quadell ^(talk) 22:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I was told that they should not be moved to the Commons until they were identified so that they could be given a proper title there. Is this not the case? Neelix (talk) 02:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Yeah, I think Commons is better equipped to handle it, so we should go ahead and move them. If you'd like help with this, let me know. – Quadell ^(talk) 01:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Transwiki to the Commons, per Quadell. Stifle (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adminbox-NAS.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hu12 (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary image. could be replaced by the code

{|style="float:right"
|-
|
(( userbox
| id   = [[Image:Admin mop.PNG|43x43px]]
| info = ((#if:(({RFA|))}|[[(({RFA))}|This user]]|This user)) is an '''[[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]]''' on the (({1|[[English Wikipedia]]))} ((#if:(({1|))}|<span style="font-size:0.9em;" class="plainlinks">([((fullurl:(({lang_code|en))}:Special:ListUsers|limit=1&username=((urlencode:(({username|((BASEPAGENAME))))))))} <span style="color:#5871C6;">verify((#if:(({lang_code|))}| (({lang_code))}|))</span>])</span>|<span style="font-size:0.9em;" class="plainlinks">([((fullurl:Special:ListUsers|limit=1&username=((urlencode:(({username|((BASEPAGENAME))))))))} <span style="color:#5871C6;">verify</span>])</span>)).
))
|-
|}

which yields the same box? (right)

This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia (verify).

This image is only used on two pages, I don't see how any harm would be done by replacing it with code at those two pages and then deleting the image. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 06:33, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - if someone wants something that has the same appearance as ((User wikipedia/Administrator)), but without the category they should probably just use the above coding. PhilKnight (talk) 09:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I just replaced the image with code above at WP:NAS, so the image is orphaned. — Jake Wartenberg 18:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Jake Wartenberg. Stifle (talk) 08:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and creator. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rjanag (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free Coke.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Captainsquidpants (notify | contribs).

• Unused file. It isn't being used for any articles and was previously requested for deletion (although the IP address forgot to list the file at AfD.) The user has been blocked indefinitely, and the image serves no purpose whatsoever. Neu_tralle 08:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bess Meyerson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sholom (notify | contribs).

• Copyright violation. The Library of Congress file is a crop of http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.06592 which is an Associated Press photograph, and not public domain. See http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/res/076_nyw.html and http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/res/155_wide.html. We could probably use it via fair use, since Miss Myerson ... no longer looks like that ... but then we probably want to use the whole thing, with full details, or some other one of these 4: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/S?pp/ils:@FILREQ(@field(SUBJ+@od1(Myerson,+Bess+))+@FIELD(COLLID+cph)) . GRuban (talk) 14:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not loc, copyrighted. Guy0307 (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Walkerma (notify | contribs).

• telenovela 6.1.1993 (talk) 14:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mindless Self Indulgence - You'll Rebel to Anything -Expanded Edition-.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alinblack (notify | contribs).

• This cover is not mentioned at all in the article, and the release is mentioned only in passing. There are two other covers used in the article. As such, the use of this cover fails the "significance" and "minimal use" elements of the NFCC, and is not justified. J Milburn (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - All deleted - Peripitus (Talk) 12:55, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ana_Rita_Contreras_Sosa.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MRDU08 (notify | contribs).

• Obviously a copyvio, though I don't have a source. Uploaded by User:MRDU08, who uploaded dozens of copyvios (saying he created them) before finally being blocked indefinitely. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

• MRD_1990_Rosario_Rodríguez.jpg
• MRD03Amelia.jpg
• MRD01Claudiadelossantos.jpg
• Tania_Medina_Collado.jpg
• City_Hall_in_Moca.jpg
• Culture_House_in_Moca.jpg
• Train_in_Moca.jpg
• Clinica_in_Moca.jpg
• Zoo_in_Moca.jpg
• Statue_of_Espaillat_in_Moca.jpg
• Sierra_de_jimani.jpg
• House_of_Jimani.jpg
• Mountains_of_Jimani.jpg
• Agricultura_de_Jimani.jpg
• Higuey_Agriculture.jpg
• Lucerna_at_Santo_Domingo_Este.jpg
• Santo_Domingo_Este_plazas.jpg
• P286059-Puerto_Plata-Playa_Dorada_Golf_Course.jpg
• YaquePP.jpg
• Playa_Dorada_PP.jpg
• TelefericoPP.jpg
• MarinaPP.jpg
• FortalezaPP.jpg
• AeroPOP.jpg
• Colon,_Dominican_Republic_1956.PNG

• Delete all It may be possible that some of the photos were actually taken by that user, but there is no camera metadata, so I would assume they were lifted from the web. Given this user's contribution history and disregard for copyright, I think it is safest to assume all are copyvio. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per Andrwsc. Guy0307 (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per Andrwsc. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete These all appear to be copyvios. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete by User:Peripitus ‎ (F9: Unambiguous copyright violation: downscale of http://www.ex-way.com/gallery/vpw-400-20.jpeg)

File:Victorpaulw.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vincehny (notify | contribs).

• Orphan and Copyright violation Domfal54 (talk) 21:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Can you provide the link or source that would make this image a copyright vio? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:33, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Way int picture.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vincehny (notify | contribs).

• Orphan and Copyright violation Domfal54 (talk) 21:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Compu class.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mcy jerry (notify | contribs).

• Decorative fair use in my mind ViperSnake151  Talk  21:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Way int logo2.PNG ‎ (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vincehny (notify | contribs).

• Orphan and Copyright violation Domfal54 (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete This should be deleted per CSD F1 - the image is a duplicate of another image on Wikipedia. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Way_int_logo.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vincehny (notify | contribs).

• Orphan and Copyright violation Domfal54 (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Way_int_crest.PNG ‎ (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vincehny (notify | contribs).

• Orphan and Copyright Violation Domfal54 (talk) 21:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Low quality, Unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Way_int_logo.JPG ‎ (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vincehny (notify | contribs).

• Orphan and Copyright violation Domfal54 (talk) 21:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Low quality, Unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crestwayint.JPG ‎ (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vincehny (notify | contribs).

• Orphan and Copyright violation Domfal54 (talk) 21:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Low quality, Unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Replacements-When_It_Began-video.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SusanLesch (notify | contribs).

• Screenshots from music videos should be used only in the article about the song in question. PhilKnight (talk) 23:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I removed the image from the article. I think there's a time and place for other uses of video screenshots, i.e. a non-literal reading of the rules, but won't argue. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:I_screenimage_30579.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Killdevil (notify | contribs).

• Replaceable non free image - other organizations have taken similar pictures, and some of these could be free. PhilKnight (talk) 23:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete on May 9 under CSD F7: Replaceable fair use as per original tagging. --Carnildo (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solarflareanimation.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Noonehasthisnameithink (notify | contribs).

• Replaceable image. PhilKnight (talk) 23:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete on May 9 under CSD F7: Replaceable fair use as per original tagging. --Carnildo (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:X3solarflare.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Noonehasthisnameithink (notify | contribs).

• Replaceable image - the ESA isn't the only agency making movies of solar flares. PhilKnight (talk) 23:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete on May 9 under CSD F7: Replaceable fair use as per original tagging. --Carnildo (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.