The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikiProjectIndustrial.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pmcginty (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Obsolete - Replaced by WikiProjectIndustrial3.png Xe7al (talk) 02:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nick Lowe - Crackin' Up excerpt.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ian Dunster (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Content of song not discussed in article. WP:NFC. This is (hopefully) a prompt to get some sourced commentary in the article. Dawnseeker2000 03:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • As below. Alecsdaniel (talk) 20:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 08:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PCD - Bottle Pop.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Alecsdaniel (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Content of song not discussed in article. WP:NFC. This is (hopefully) a prompt to get some sourced commentary in the article. Dawnseeker2000 03:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. An article about a song should have a sample of the song to ilustrate it. That's what this file does. Alecsdaniel (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I think article's about songs should definitely have samples. But what I'm trying to do is only add samples to articles if there's something to be said about the content of the song. It's one of our requirements to use media in articles. So I'm only trying to get a bare minimum of discussion about the song in the article. The Bottle Pop article does not meet this minimum requirement; the only discussion is about the release of the song, its chart performance, and the video. There is no content about the song itself. Dawnseeker2000 22:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, yes, there should be info about the structure, but just because there isn't any, doesn't mean the file should be deleted. Alecsdaniel (talk) 12:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Actually there is a reason that it should be deleted. There's NFCC policy number 8. At the very minimum the article should have some sourced text that talks about the meaning of the song. This article doesn't have any so I was using this process to get some improvement to the article, but none has been made. If there's nothing to be said about the song, maybe we shouldn't have the audio clip. Dawnseeker2000 19:15, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Well, I think a sample of the song would really significantly increase the readers' understanding of the topic. Alecsdaniel (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll withdraw my nomination if the article gets some content that actually discusses the song. Dawnseeker2000 03:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Alecsdaniel (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - it's better Dawnseeker2000 03:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monte Cassino troops.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Halibutt (notify | contribs | uploads).

• fron pl.wp: pl:Plik:Monte Cassino 01.jpg, have deleted. no source Shizhao (talk) 03:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AaGoGonk plates2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ro-gonk06 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Derivative work that cannot be claimed under Wikipedia's non-free content criteria. Blurpeace 05:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiefersutherland shirtless thumb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by User:Erraticdancer (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project) Moxy (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack-bauer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by User:Erraticdancer (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project) Moxy (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erratic00.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by User:Erraticdancer (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project) Moxy (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kdawg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by User:Erraticdancer (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project) Moxy (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:167b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Orinix (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unused, low resolution photo. Would require OTRS verification to meet current licensing standards. Blurpeace 09:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:167b4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Orinix (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unused, low resolution photo. Would require OTRS verification to meet current licensing standards. Blurpeace 09:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:F-15B-S-MTD 59.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Zeroyon (notify | contribs | uploads).

• The uploader claimed it from US government but i cannot find the original image from NASA archive (USAF my possibly the original creator) As no source information, it cannot assume it from US government. Moveover, the image is effective replaced by File:F15 ACTIVE.jpg Matthew_hk tc 09:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Padonkadonk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Reroman123 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Poor quality image with no indication of notability of subjects. Haruth (talk) 11:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Page-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chandruselva (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Poor quality image. Possibly non free, foreign language newspaper? Haruth (talk) 11:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Page-3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chandruselva (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Poor quality image. Possibly non free, foreign language newspaper? Haruth (talk) 11:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patrick Marleau San Jose Sharks.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Drumjeff215 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Duplicate in Commons already. Haruth (talk) 12:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pheel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by DFYOU (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Poor quality orphan. Subject not identified. No foreseeable encyclopedic value. Haruth (talk) 12:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhilbertAngry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Epmatsw (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphan with no description identifying notability of subject. Only use by uploader and a group of IP's to create [Philbert], a vandalised version of the proper article. No other foreseeable use. Haruth (talk) 12:47, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picerror.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Lucky13pjn (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphan, subject unclear with no indication of encyclopedic value. Haruth (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picture027.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by JattNation (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Image appears to have been created to publicise telephone number of an organisation. No encyclopedic value. Haruth (talk) 12:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. I was oblivious to the two sentences in the article. — ξ^xplicit 22:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:When We Were Young video.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tuzapicabit (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image is not being discussed in the article nor does not add significantly to readers' understanding. — ξ^xplicit 22:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Yes the image is discussed in the video paragraph and particularly with : "the group appear against a garishly-coloured chroma key background." The photo illustrates how this is depicted.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.