The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RH-Fedora logo-nonfree.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Koman90 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Bad SVG (traced), and SVGs are not permitted for mass distribution under Fedora's trademark guidelines. PNGs are perfectly fine, but SVGs may not be hosted on Wikipedia (for much the same reason that Wikipedia logo SVGs cannot be freely redistributed). --Ian Weller (talk) 15:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I checked the link provided above, and did not see a mention of SVGs not being allowed, but I did swap out this logo with a png one. This file is now orphaned.--Rockfang (talk) 02:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I created this trace pre a graphics lab request as no vector source file available Charles E. Keisler (talk), Network+ 04:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patio2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Andrew Parodi (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, unidentified, uploaded over 4 years ago, and of doubtful use on Commons. Rodhullandemu 20:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons and Rename - Again, this is another photograph of the Living Enrichment Center, and a similar image of the same location can be found here. ----DanTD (talk) 14:33, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The linked image seems to be a re-upload, and only one is required. Agree with move, rename, and delete local copy. Rodhullandemu 00:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: The file was moved from File:Patio2.jpg to File:Living Enrichment Center patio2.jpg by TheDJ (talk · contribs) at 14:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC). AnomieBOT⚡ 15:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Andrew Parodi (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, unidentified, of little value to Commons. Uploaded over four years ago. Rodhullandemu 21:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons and Rename - I've noticed a pattern with some of these photos. This one is one of many of the former Living Enrichment Center. I'm currently in the process of fixing them now, and I'm going to rename this one. ----DanTD (talk) 14:19, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

per comment above. Rodhullandemu 00:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question Doesn't adding categories to orphan images tend to remove them from the orphan list? I've often added categories to people's images(including my own), and found the orphan tags no longer exist on file uploads of users. ----DanTD (talk) 12:44, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: The file was moved from File:Ramp.jpg to File:Ramp at the Living Enrichment Center.jpg by TheDJ (talk · contribs) at 14:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC). AnomieBOT⚡ 15:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete under F8, available under File:Visakhapatnam130.jpg. — ξ^xplicit 00:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vb130.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sureshiras (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, unidentified, of little value to Commons without. Rodhullandemu 21:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete under F8, available under File:Visakhapatnam140.jpg. — ξ^xplicit 00:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vb140.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sureshiras (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, unidentified and of little use on Commons without. Shame, because this user has uploaded good images, but it helps if we know what they are. Rodhullandemu 21:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Judging by the initials, and the pattern of the editor/photographer, this and "Vb130" seem to be two of many photographs of Visakhapatnam, in India. ----DanTD (talk) 05:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.