The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 00:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete (moot as images have been deleted aside from this FFD). Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 12:14, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
These images were all uploaded by a single user that has now been indef blocked for various spamming-related activities. No evident encyclopaedic value; seem intended only to promote a single company's products. I'm surprised that this isn't a speedy criteria. Crispmuncher (talk) 01:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned. One thing Wikipedia does not need is more images of kittens, especially unidentified varieties. Besides, this one is kinda creepy. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:03, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, low quality, better illustrated by File:Terry Fox Statue db.jpg (another image of the same statue). Sven Manguard Wha? 06:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Almost certainly not PD-self, so a copyvio. Orphaned, no apparent encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely no encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned and unencyclopedic. User photo of long gone user. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Low quality image of a Zebra, location unknown. Upload summary was "Will be deleted", so it might be a db-self? Not sure. Either way it's unusable. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, seems highly unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder B (talk) 11:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, seems highly unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder B (talk) 11:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic B (talk) 12:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Low Quality, used in a now AfD'd article, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY (TALK) 19:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not really self-made. Only the screen grabbing was done by the user. damiens.rf 21:11, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Excessive fairuse. Screen cap of host is unnecessary and does not add understanding to description of article topic. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Excessive fairuse. Screen cap of contestant podium is unnecessary and does not add understanding to description of article topic. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Excessive fairuse. Similar screen cap of gameboard is already included in article text. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Excessive fairuse. Screen cap of copyright is unnecessary and does not add understanding to description of article topic. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused personal image of a Wikipedia user. Unencyclopedic. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, low quality, presumably intended for use in an article which was deleted, so probably unencyclopedic. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The source image (commons:File:Weihnachtsmann.jpeg) was deleted as having invalid (Wikipedia-only) permission. Since this is apparently a derivative work of that image, it also lacks proper permission. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]