< September 16	September 18 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. No encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 00:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:NOTWEBHOST, orphaned & useless. Acather96 (talk) 16:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is tagged and described as a school logo, but this image is more than just the logo—it's a collage of photographs of several schools, with the logo overlaid in the center. The logo itself is actually a small portion of the image. Hence, this image fails WP:NFCC#1 (replaceable by freely licensed photographs of the schools) and WP:NFCC#3 (more non-free content is used than is necessary). —Bkell (talk) 02:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, while the actual school logo would almost definitely meet NFCC, this doesn't due to the reasons stated by the nominator. What's more, the image has quite a promotional feel to it, and Wikipedia is not a soapbox for promotion. Acather96 (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned un-cleaned-up version of File:GenLThomas.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 04:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, there's nothing of value that File:GenLThomas.jpg doesn't have, no reason to keep this. Acather96 (talk) 16:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned version of File:Francis Preston Blair Sr.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 04:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, there's nothing of value that File:Francis Preston Blair Sr.jpg doesn't have, no reason to keep this. Acather96 (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned version of File:Nathaniel Prentice Banks.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 05:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm inclined to keep this image, unlike the other two nominatined above the image is isn't just cleaned up, it is largely cropped. The composition and contents of the room the subject is in are interesting, and may have some historical/contextual importance. What's more, File:Nathaniel P. Banks.jpg is cropped so much that only the head & shoulders are available, and it would be a shame to lose the rest of this image. Acather96 (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, or move to Commons. Public domain and clearly encyclopedic. Per WP:COBWEB, there is no reason whatsoever that we cannot have both cropped and uncropped versions. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned version of File:Thomas Kinsella New York - Brady-Handy.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 05:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, there's nothing of value that File:Thomas Kinsella New York - Brady-Handy.jpg doesn't have, no reason to keep this. Acather96 (talk) 16:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned version of File:Thomas Kinsella New York - Brady-Handy.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 05:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, there's nothing of value that File:Thomas Kinsella New York - Brady-Handy.jpg doesn't have, no reason to keep this. Acather96 (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Bkell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from Flickr [1], where it is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0). The "non-commercial" part of that license is not free enough for Wikipedia. No evidence that the copyright holder has released it under a freer license. —Bkell (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is a completely different photo earlier in the file history—that one is from a different Flickr user [2] and is labeled "All Rights Reserved". —Bkell (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Bkell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Bkell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 09:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned temporary file Acather96 (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned temporary file Acather96 (talk) 09:29, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned temporary file. Acather96 (talk) 09:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned temporary file. Acather96 (talk) 09:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned temporary file. Acather96 (talk) 09:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned temporary file. Acather96 (talk) 09:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image. 90.51.209.96 (talk) 13:14, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/Move to Commons Being orphaned is not a reason to delete (see WP:COBWEB), and the image could potentially have some uses. Acather96 (talk) 16:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm not entirely convinced that there is a use for the image, but there could be, and the nominator has failed to provide a valid rationale for deletion. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan file and redundant to File:Cap site sign.jpg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 15:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no reason to keep this as File:Cap site sign.jpg does not have the distracting background and is of the same if not better quality, the content of the sign is identical. Acather96 (talk) 16:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted per G7 by Merope (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA); completely forgot I uploaded these for use on my userpage (which I subsequently chickened out of doing). Oops. -- Merope 21:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentifiable person, no foreseeable use. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 16:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, lack of identificational info makes this useless, and it's not really encyclopedic given the pose. The user has been editing a small amount recently, so they may be able to shed some light on the matter. Acather96 (talk) 16:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted per G7 by Merope (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA); completely forgot I uploaded these for use on my userpage (which I subsequently chickened out of doing). Oops. -- Merope 21:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentifiable person, no foreseeable use. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 16:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, lack of identificational info makes this useless, however the user has been editing a small amount recently, so they may be able to shed some light on the matter. For now though, and unless a reason can be provided to the contrary, there is no reason to keep this. Acather96 (talk) 16:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photograph of the Basilica di Santa Croce (Lecce), with a prominent logo in the corner. The permission from the copyright holder reads, "Se desiderate possiamo proporvi l'inserimento direttamente su Wikipedia di 1-2 immagini delle principali città italiane, purchè sia mantenuto il nostro logo nelle immagini stesse e purchè, oltre al copyright da voi proposto, a fondo pagina sia presente un link." ~~Google Translate says that~~ this means, "If you want, we can offer you the direct entry on Wikipedia of 1-2 images of major Italian cities, provided that our logo is kept in the images themselves and provided that, in addition to the copyright proposed by you, there shall be a link at the bottom of the page." So it sounds as though permission was granted for Wikipedia use only, and only if the image is not modified. Such permission is not free enough. —Bkell (talk) 16:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've taken the freedom to fix the translation above. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, our copyright policy - specifically WP:COPYOTHERS - states clearly that all material used on Wikipedia must be either licensed under a free license (one that allows unlimited modification and reuse, even commercially, of the work), or it should be claimed under fair use if it meets our non-free content criteria. This file would not meet the NFCC as it fails criterion 1 - it is clearly an image for which a free license alternative could easily be found. So delete per WP:COPYOTHERS and (kind of) WP:NFCC, but for future reference this kind of nomination should be made at possibly unfree files. Acather96 (talk) 16:46, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm, I listed it here because I was pretty certain it should just be deleted. WP:PUF is not for deletion discussions, it's for discussions to determine the copyright and licensing status of images. So I list things at WP:PUF when I am simply confused about the copyright status, or I think that the claimed license is false, or I think there's a reasonable chance the image should be kept—none of which were the case for this image. —Bkell (talk) 17:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - You could argue that the license is false (going by the tag); personally I was always of the belief that when an image that was tagged as free could actually be non-free, as it is in this case, that PUF is the correct forum for discussion. After all, it is for files that are 'possinly un-free', which this file is. Acather96 (talk) 18:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: First thing, the image has a wrong description. It's not a church in Lecce, but (as the filename says), the Sanctuary in Monte Sant'Angelo (cf. File:Santuario san michele arcangelo.jpg). About the copyright: one crucial question would be what the "oltre al copyright da voi proposto" ("in addition to the copyright you proposed") referred to. If this refers to the editor asking the owner to release it under GFDL, then I'd say this is a release under the GFDL, is it not? Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- On second thought, delete, the specification that the logo must remain present restricts the freedom of modification too much. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. No encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, low-quality and unencyclopedic, as this is a personal photograph it could also be argued that WP:NOTWEBHOST applies, as I believe it does. Acather96 (talk) 18:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fanart base on a copyrighted character. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 17:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While I'm not sure that the image is actually close enough to the base copyrighted work to qualify as a derivative work, it is certianly unencyclopedic and has no foreseeable use at all. Also it should be noted that Wikipedia is not a free web host for one's personal drawings. Acather96 (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo for a real estate company, with a promotional description. This logo is supposedly freely licensed, but since it seems the company is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article, I see no encyclopedic use for the logo. —Bkell (talk) 17:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, as the company does not meet our notability guidelines for corporations, as a project we have no foreseeable use for this file. Furthermore, the dubious free license claim and promotional text are also a concern - see WP:COPYVIO and WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Acather96 (talk) 18:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by CactusWriter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vector version available - IISER-K Logo.svg Dvidby0 (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to File:Creative Nomad Jukebox (DAP).jpg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 17:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I Photoshopped it to make it better. Open up both and compare. I uploaded it but I didn't really know how to replace the old image. Then I forgot about it. You guys should keep it! ... -- Brendinooo (talk) 03:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons. That's the solution to the uploader's question. This image is better than the original, so there's no reason to lose it. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oprhan file, redundant to File:Niamey district.png. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 18:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oprhan image with an unidentifiable person. No foreseeable use. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 18:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 18:52, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned version of File:JosFChaves.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 18:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan file, redundant to File:NigerDeltaStates.png. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 19:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned crop of File:Millard Fillmore.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 20:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oprhaned file, redundant to File:New English Bible cover.jpg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:22, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality orphaned image. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 21:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I honestly wish this were in better condition. I can't even see weather and age as an excuse for the condition of this image. ----DanTD (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oprhan media, redundant to File:Nablus Great Mosque.jpg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:53, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality and redundant to File:Mudhumalai.JPG. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned version of File:Robert H. Milroy - Brady-Handy.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 22:08, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal file of an inactive user, no foreseeable use. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 22:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lower-res version of File:Andrew Curtin2.jpg, only used on a user page. Kelly ^hi! 22:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oprhan file, redundant to File:Chineseflagtibet.jpg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 22:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the right side of the image in the source. It says: "Some Rights Reserved". Click on it and you will find that it is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Townblight (talk) 23:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file and incorrect version of File:MT Tucson.png. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 23:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned version of File:GHBoker.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 23:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo of an inactive use, no foreseeable encyclopaedic use. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 23:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and Special:Contributions/Mtariq. In his nearly six years at Wikipedia, the user has no edits outside the images of himself he uploaded and his userspace. Cunard (talk) 23:50, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a social networking site. MER-C 01:56, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo of an inactive use, no foreseeable encyclopaedic use. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 23:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and Special:Contributions/Mtariq. In his nearly six years at Wikipedia, the user has no edits outside the images of himself he uploaded and his userspace. Cunard (talk) 23:50, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a social networking site. MER-C 01:57, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, possibly copyrighted. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 23:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan file, redundant to File:Muscle Force Velocity relationship.png. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 23:20, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think deletion is not a problem, and I'm sorry for causing this housekeeping issue. Thanks for correcting it (I do not deal often with Wikipedia policies, and every time I have to learn all over what I have to do).--Gciriani (talk) 19:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image, no foreseeable use. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 23:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date version of File:NAC-USA-states.PNG. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 23:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, redundant to File:Naga1.jpg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 23:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image, redundant to File:Naga4.jpg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 23:39, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

September 17

File:Erm........jpg

File:WA Seal.jpg

File:Lorenzo Thomas.jpg

File:FPB-Sr.jpg

File:Nathaniel P. Banks.jpg

File:ThosKinsella.jpg

File:ThomasKinsella.jpg

File:SF Chinatown Nights2.jpg

File:SF Chinatown Lady Shaw Center.jpg

File:SF Chinatown Moon Festival Costume.jpg

File:ASC T-135 drawing.jpg

File:Tower Bridge London Feb 2006 crop.jpg

File:Tower Bridge London Feb 2006 temp.jpg

File:Povray output.jpg

File:AC3D 3d window.jpg

File:Pink rose albury botanical gardens edit02.jpg

File:Pink rose albury botanical gardens edit blown.jpg

File:Papio High2005.jpg

File:Cap site Sign.jpg

File:Notmerope.jpg

File:NotMerope.jpg

File:Monte sant'angelo Sanctuary (GloboPix).jpg

File:Pia Fajelagutan.jpg

File:CARNAGE.jpg

File:El shams real estate logo.jpg

File:IISER-K.gif

File:Nomad.jpg

File:Niamey District.png

File:Nick bacon.jpg

File:Nico.jpg

File:JFChaves.jpg

File:NigerDeltaStates.PNG

File:MillardFillmore.png

File:Newenglishbible.JPG

File:AmCard.JPG

File:Nablus Great Mosque.JPG

File:Mudhumalai.jpg

File:Robert H. Milroy.jpg

File:Chapter two.jpg

File:Andrew Gregg Curtin.jpg

File:ChineseflagTibet.jpg

File:Dr. Jayaprakash Narayan.jpg

File:MT Tucson.PNG

File:GeorgeHBoker.jpg

File:MTARIQ.jpg

File:MTariq.jpg

File:Mtlogo.jpg

File:Muscle Force Velocity Relationship.PNG

File:My face.jpg

File:North Atlantic Conference states.png

File:Naga1.JPG

File:Naga4.JPG