< August 30 | September 1 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan file. SVG version available at File:Question mark alternate.svg. No need to keep Ronhjones (Talk) 00:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not discussed in article. Bulwersator (talk) 00:22, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 00:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Most certainly does not meet the NFCC requirements for use in the one article it is used in. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
without critical commentary Bulwersator (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
without critical commentary in article Bulwersator (talk) 07:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Obsolete JMHorrocks (talk) 11:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a logo, so the own work claim is dubious. Furthermore, it is only used in the Wikipedia talk namespace in an article which has been rejected multiple times at WP:AfC, so fair use isn't applicable. Stefan2 (talk) 16:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually what I want is to include this logo on the article I am writing for Sri Lanka Baptist Sangamaya. As I am new to writing articles in wikipedia, I am learning wikipedia syntax & rules using trial and error method. That is the reason why my article was rejected several times by the administrators. I believe you will help me in this process by further guiding me retaining this logo for the above purpose. (Sri Lanka Baptist Sangamaya has appointed me as their official person to handle their web related work.)Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chamant12 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice. I went through the Conflict of interest article.
1. Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources.
=> Sri lanka Baptist Sangamaya is very new to web although it has been standing out in Sri Lanka for 200 years. As a result There are very few online article which I can demonstrate as online reference(first three references on my article). However I have successfully able to find three individual books written by foreign and local independent, non related, non affiliated authors describing facts about Sri Lanka Baptist Sangamaya. These three books are available on google books and I have added them under external links.
=> Other inline citations I have marked are links to web pages on sites of organizations of which Sri Lanka Baptist Sangamaya is a member of. As the content on my writing describes the same fact (of Sangamaya's membership) I believe these links are worth more than just directory listings. Further as these sites are independent sites of organizations themselves, I believe my referencing is reliable, noteworthy and acceptable under wikipedia policies.
2. Your role is to inform and reference, not promote or sell.
=> As it is about a religious organization, it is describing religious activities and facts about that denomination in Sri Lanka.
=> Further as it is a nonprofit organization, it is not expecting to sell anything neither through its own official site nor through wikipedia.
=> I have tried my best to avoid promoting Christianity or the Baptist Denomination in my article. However if you are still finding any controversy about this matter in my article, I am requesting your kind help on pointing out the specific sentence or phrase that needs to be modified to rectify this issue.
3. Write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject.
=> As a matter of fact, I am a free lance web developer and I only developed the web site for Sri Lanka Baptist Sangamaya.
=> The site I developed for them was done for charity.
=> I have no bias on them of what so ever on my article and I believe that I will maintain this in future as well.
4. State facts and statistics, don't be vague or general.
=> Facts are referenced from the different references I have used and are not vague other than that nobody can say exactly the actual number of believer belonging to a Christian denomination at a given moment.
5. Take time to get sources and policy right and your content will last.
=> As discussed above.
6. Be transparent about your conflict of interest
=> I believe I have made myself transparent at this moment.
7. Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your content
=> I believe neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors will help me once my article becomes visible to them.
Thanks
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chamant12 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This image is currently being used in the [| Talk article : Sri Lanka Baptist Sangamaya]. Once this article gets approved it will be using this image while being in the articles section of wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chamant12 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. Next time confronted with this situation, the nominator may wish to consider searching on the Internet for a better quality version of the same thing. I did this, and found an acceptable alternative in less than thirty seconds. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Low quality image. Interlude 65 16:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, unlikely to be used Bulwersator (talk) 17:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, was used illustrate a post on a talk page, regarding removal of text. The issue's closed now, so , feel free to delete it. "....We are all Kosh...." <-Babylon-5-> 18:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, without good description Bulwersator (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused personal image Bulwersator (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused diagram Bulwersator (talk) 17:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused diagram, replaced by svg Bulwersator (talk) 17:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused diagram Bulwersator (talk) 17:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Small, unused, without proper description Bulwersator (talk) 17:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced by svg Bulwersator (talk) 17:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, unlikely to be used Bulwersator (talk) 17:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced by svg Bulwersator (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, without description Bulwersator (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, low quality Bulwersator (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, unlikely to be used (see top-left corner) Bulwersator (talk) 17:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
replaced by svg Bulwersator (talk) 17:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused personal image Bulwersator (talk) 17:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use logo used within Science (TV channel) currently in a purely decorative role. Cloudbound (talk) 18:30, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use logo used within Science (TV channel) currently in a purely decorative role. Cloudbound (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use logo used within Science (TV channel) currently in a purely decorative role. Cloudbound (talk) 18:34, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced with Southwest Airlines Logo.png JetBlast (talk) 21:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This 1970 stamps is copyright for 50 years per commons:Template:PD-United Arab Emirates stamp. The image fails WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8 for both uses. There is no commentary of any kind but is used as decoration in Sharjah (emirate) and there is a main article Postage stamps and postal history of Sharjah where it might have a chance of complying with WP:NFCC. The 2nd use in AMC Cavalier has no WP:FURG. ww2censor (talk) 22:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]