< December 2 | December 4 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 00:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 00:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a title card; every title card is not mentioned explicitly in every episode article. This is no exception. If it were a stand-alone TV film, like Fab Five: The Texas Cheerleader Scandal, the title card would be acceptable. However, the topic is an episode, so this image must go right away. (This nomination is approved optionally by my mentor Begoon.) George Ho (talk) 07:24, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
low quality - apparently a joke 88.98.174.106 (talk) 14:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of the actual original source/copyright holder. No explanation of what this image illustrates which could not be illustrated with words alone. J Milburn (talk) 23:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]