The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan & Unencyclopedic SkyMachine (++) 08:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like replaceable fair use to me since the person is still alive. The text "One is freely allowed to reproduce this image, under the condition that 'the photographic service of the French PM' is mentioned" might not be free enough: it is not clear if derivative works are allowed. Besides, there is no source for this statement. Stefan2 (talk) 11:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of an old coin with an unidentified photographer. Can be replaced by a free photo by an identified photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 11:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of an old coin with an unidentified photographer. Can be replaced by a free photo by an identified photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This looks way too detailed to be a logo (as stated in the fair use rationale). Besides, it seems to fail WP:NFCC completely as the article doesn't need any fair use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File is copyrighted: the source says (translated): Nothing of this website may be used for puclication without prior permission. All pictures and texts are copyrighted. Romaine (talk) 16:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned local copy of a Commons file. Kelly hi! 16:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: What part of "The uploader or another editor requests that the local copy of this file be kept." do you not understand?--King Bedford I Seek his grace 08:43, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, likely a derivative work. Kelly hi! 16:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 16:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly hi! 16:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned local version of Commons file. Kelly hi! 17:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Oppose: What part of "The uploader or another editor requests that the local copy of this file be kept." do you not understand?--King Bedford I Seek his grace 08:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; gross violation of WP:NFCC. Why are we even discussing this?? -FASTILY (TALK) 01:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use claim based on inability to create free image. It's a graph. Of course one could make a graph of the same data. Nat Gertler (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Useless, as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DragonHearth resulted in deletion of DragonHearth. Unused. Bulwersator (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, possibly non-free. Kelly hi! 20:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 21:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 21:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 22:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 22:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free screenshot that is only used in an infobox on Hillary Howard (although she does host It's Academic, it is not essential for the purposes of an infobox picture that she be depicted hosting It's Academic). As Howard is a living person, the presumption is that a free photo could be taken of her (perhaps hosting It's Academic, because, as I understand it, Altman Prods. is less strict about a no-camera policy than other producers). In any event, the use of this image violates WP:NFCC criterion #1 (replaceability). RJaguar3 | u | t 22:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is not the official seal of Orleans County, New York, although it claims to be. I have uploaded the correct seal here. This may be a candidate for speedy, but I wanted to nominate it here just in case. Andrew (User:90) (talk) 22:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 23:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused fictional coat of arms. Editor retired Bulwersator (talk) 23:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused useless file (outdated) Bulwersator (talk) 23:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused useless OR (without sources) Bulwersator (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused logo Bulwersator (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]