The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An image of Tainan Municipal Baseball Stadium. The source is dead, so the license can't be checked, and the article is already illustrated with a similar picture. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no real context and therefore no apparent encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, low quality image of Tainan Municipal Baseball Stadium. License is dubious and would need an OTRS or a link to a website. Article is already illustrated. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned logo, not clear which Taurus this corresponds to, and the most obvious user of logos named Taurus, the gun manufacturer, has a different logo. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Low Quality, superseded by File:FOV Target on Monitor.png, no foreseeable use. FASTILY Happy 2012!! 03:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused amateur drawing of Thomas Merton. No real use. Fan art? An attempt at WSJ-style drawings? Possibly a recreation (read: derivative work) of an copyrighted image? GrapedApe (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused amateur drawing of Shunryu Suzuki. No real use. Fan art? An attempt at WSJ-style drawings? Possibly a recreation (read: derivative work) of an copyrighted image? GrapedApe (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused amateur drawing of Shunryu Suzuki. No real use. Fan art? An attempt at WSJ-style drawings? Possibly a recreation (read: derivative work) of an copyrighted image? GrapedApe (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused amateur drawing of Shunryu Suzuki. No real use. Fan art? An attempt at WSJ-style drawings? Possibly a recreation (read: derivative work) of an copyrighted image? GrapedApe (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
has been made obsolete by File:Decision Problem.svg The Haz talk 04:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
no stated source, uploader has uploaded numerous sound clips by this artist and tagged them own work Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
no stated source, uploader has uploaded numerous sound clips by this artist and tagged them own work Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Prophet X) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, related to Different Harmonic Modes Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, related to Different Harmonic Modes Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, related to Different Harmonic Modes, no stated source Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not really worth moving to commons - simple black polygon GIF Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contains copyrighted Microsoft windows elements. Needs FUR Sreejith K (talk) 05:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This image might be little complicated than what is required for ((PD-textlogo)) Sreejith K (talk) 06:17, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dispute the fair use of the helmets (as distinct from the logo) part of this image, the source is given as http://nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/index.htm AND http://nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/, neither of which release the helmet part for free use.
This helmet image can be replaced by a free ones taken at any game with a FUR made for the part of the image that is the logo. Mtking (edits) 09:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dispute the fair use of this helmet picture, the logo displayed is not copyrightable as it contains only letters so there is no need to use a copyright image (from http://www.mghelmets.com) when a free one can be obtained at any game. Mtking (edits) 09:14, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
clear copyvio from http://www.nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/, no FUR can be made for it's use it is replaceable with a free one taken at any game. Mtking (edits) 09:17, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe that this software screenshot qualifies for PD-ineligible, it is not simple text and geometric objects in the spirit of PD-textlogo, it's a full composition. If it's decided to be kept, it needs a FUR, but in the way it's used, I don't think it's sufficiently different from the other RSoD on the page to warrant the inclusion of both. (Placed up for deletion at Commons as well). Sven Manguard Wha? 14:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
CC-BY-2.0 copyright status is unverifiable. Image was uploaded 4+ years ago from flickr with a claim of free license, but that free license was never confirmed. That flickr user is now gone, meaning that we have no way to verify the copyright status of this image. Contested NSD. If this were on Commons, it would be long gone. GrapedApe (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
replaced by Scott_brown_systematic.ogg Revolt (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Neither the image's description page, nor its use in 1992 Venezuelan coup d'état attempts, nor any of the keep votes here make the case that this is a historically important image, as opposed to merely being an image of a historic event. --Carnildo (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Extended explanation, in response to the comments on my talk page.
After discarding User:jbmurray's vote as irrelevant and ignoring the bickering about procedural matters, the debate comes down to the question of "is this a historically significant image", in the context of non-free content criteria #8, contextual significance. My understanding of "a historically significant image" is that one should be able to write about the creation, context, and impact of the image itself, in the manner of Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima, The Blue Marble, or Guerrillero Heroico.
Of the "keep" voters, Dreadstar, Hobit, and Thincat make unbacked assertions that it's historic, while 74.74.150.139's assertion that it "adds to the reader's understanding of this historic event" barely touches on context, and ignores creation and impact entirely. This adds up to a very weak case for keeping the image.
Of the "delete" voters, Mtking asserts that it fails WP:NFCC#8 (contextual significance) without explanation, but the non-free content policy places the burden of proof on editors who want the image kept, and the image description page makes no explanation of why this image is significant in the context of 1992 Venezuelan coup d'état attempts, while 74.74.150.139 claims that it adds to the reader's understanding of it, without explaining how it does so.
Most significantly, User:Armbrust raises the point that the article does not contain sourced critical commentary about the image (the "creation, context, and impact" factors). Without this commentary, there is no evidence that this is a historic image, and since the burden of proof for non-free images lies on those who wish to keep them, I have chosen to delete the image. --Carnildo (talk) 05:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free decorative image showing two important men meeting, used just to make the point that they once met, and purportedly to show how one of the guys likes to dress (although we have better free images to do this job). No relevant information is uniquely conveyed by this picture. damiens.rf 20:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No forseen use. Uploader #2 requested deletion here http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZooFari&oldid=64723250#Could_you_check_your_uploads_on_en-wiki? MGA73 (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No forseen use. Uploader #2 requested deletion here http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZooFari&oldid=64723250#Could_you_check_your_uploads_on_en-wiki? MGA73 (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 22:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]