The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Somewhat inferior crop of File:Air Seychelles new livery.jpg. Cloudbound (talk) 01:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic Taylor2646 (talk) 06:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused personal photo. No encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 06:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Insufficient context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 06:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Used as illustration without any kind of commentary. Bulwersator (talk) 07:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused low quality crop Bulwersator (talk) 07:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. Currently in use at Adalberon (Bishop of Laon). De728631 (talk) 20:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused low quality diagram Bulwersator (talk) 07:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. De728631 (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned file Bulwersator (talk) 08:15, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, small, without any information about source etc Bulwersator (talk) 08:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Low quality, unused Bulwersator (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, small Bulwersator (talk) 08:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: move to Commons. If the status is murky on this, but Commons leans free on this, then it seems the best course of action is to give it to Commons and let it be handled over there, especially when it's orphaned locally, and if Commons decides to delete it, then they delete it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused logo Bulwersator (talk) 08:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((Non-free Philippines government))
with ((PD-PhilippinesGov))
. Very confusing and both templates have been kept in deletion discussions on both websites. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]The result of the discussion was: keep following responses to my inquiry. Seems to meet requirements now. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not discussed in article Bulwersator (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Though there is a well thought out rationale - this is a non-free image of a rash in what news reports show is a relatively common disease. A free image could be taken - Peripitus (Talk) 12:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 12:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G4 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wikicode uploaded as a PDF file. Clearly out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, extremely small, without OTRS ticket Bulwersator (talk) 15:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, unlikely to be used Bulwersator (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"This file is in the public domain, because the work depicted was published in 1916 " -- it may be later edition, photo itself may be unfree (image of 3D object etc) Bulwersator (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded the wrong file - one with a watermark I added on. File:Bonnie_Tyler_and_Lorraine_Crosby.jpg. Bonnietylersave (talk) 17:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 19:15, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete. De728631 (talk) 20:08, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#3a: superfluous to File:Whitesnake lad.jpg which is almost identical. Stefan2 (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete. NB: A different image of the same name is being hosted on Commons. De728631 (talk) 17:51, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused photo. The subject is apparently the uploader. Was used in a vanity article that was deleted (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Westendorf). No further encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 23:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]