< February 6 | February 8 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused graph of no real encyclopedic use Sreejith K (talk) 04:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of a 2D artistic work. Is the original painting old enough to be in Public Domain? In that case this can be kept. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OR Amitpandey21 (talk) 10:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 17:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 since there already is a different cover there. Stefan2 (talk) 10:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Apparent duplicate of File:Sanja Stijacic (2004).jpg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:15, 7 February 2013 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:15, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What is it? Too blurry to be encyclopedic. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Used as a current 20 kr note, but it is not a current note. It is an older version which can't be used since the end of 2005. You can see an example of the old one here and the new one here. Apart from that, the image violates WP:NFCC#3a since it duplicates File:Collage SEK.png (which contains a new 20 kr note). Stefan2 (talk) 13:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]