The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot capella-1.01-12.05.1992.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by L.Willms (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The image's NFUR states "This file is to be used to illustrate the long history of the program and to serve as reference to the statement in the "history" section of the article." This is blatantly not allowable under WP:NFCC; images used as references are cited, not uploaded. Violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. RJaguar3 | u | t 04:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So when I change the rationale to something less precise, you have no longer any objections to the use of this image? Besides that, I have the authorizaton of the software company which publishes capella. tut, tut, tut. --L.Willms (talk) 06:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the rationale would not help WP:NFCC compliance, as the image is currently being used decoratively as a reference; the image itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. For information about donating your image to Wikipedia, please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials and WP:Requesting copyright permission. RJaguar3 | u | t 16:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:PHOTO OF MARK WORRALL TAKEN AT CHELSEA FC 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Previously published: http://www.gate17.co.uk |Date = 2007-07-12 |Author = 176.35.122.103 (talk) 16:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC) This photograph is being used in breach of copyright - webmaster gate17 - and without the permission of the subject or the person who took the photograph. The image is also an orphan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.77.126 (talk) 14:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ltnitsxrlogo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ramanujan Das Patra (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Logo of an unidentified entity. As such, the file is out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.