The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:The cytoskeleton of an endothelial cell.tif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scarpino28 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Until today the image was used in the article Microtubule. However, as someone on the discussion page noticed, there seemed to be a problem with the label of the fluorescent parts in the picture. According to the caption on the NIH website where the image is from, the fluorescent red structures are actin. However, user Eszcze suspected that those structures rather look like mitochondria, not actin. I agreed, so I decided to email the author of the image, Tina Carvalho, who sent me a lengthy reply explaining that the image is very old, problematic for technical reasons and that it was never meant to be released into the public domain in the first place. The image caption was not written by her. Unfortunately, she could not locate her notes on that particular image but believes the red is actually MitoTracker Red and those are mitochondria, not actin filaments. Therefore the caption of the image is most likely incorrect. Since even the author of the image can not say with certainty which structure of the cell has been stained here, I believe the image should be deleted to avoid further confusion. There are already plenty of other similar images available here that show the parts of the cytoskeleton and where there is no ambiguity about what is what. SPLETTE :] ^{How's my driving?} 12:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete if the facts above are true. I'm not saying you're making this up, Splette. :) I have no clue on this subject. Rehman 14:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your trust :) Anyone who would like to confirm what I wrote above, can get in touch with Tina Carvalho (the author of the image) here. I didn't want to post her full email verbatim here without permission. SPLETTE :] ^{How's my driving?} 21:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ali Azam Warraich.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AliAzam150 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

UE - personal photo used in deleted autobio page which was moved about a lot but ended at Wikipedia:Ali Azam Warraich. JohnCD (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Also no longer used. Rehman 14:55, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.