The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 06:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allsaintssecbad.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jgittins (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused, blurry. We have clearer photos at Commons:Category:Basilica of Our Lady of the Assumption, Secunderabad. Kelly ^hi! 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: We don't have much replacements. If this is kept, it should be moved to Commons. Rehman 23:33, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons Image shows a portion of the building not shown in other Commons photographs AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 15:38, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep czar 22:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anna Fegi Headshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Untdrum99 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I think this photo requires OTRS evidence of permission. Kelly ^hi! 14:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kelly, I am the owner of the photo, along with my wife, Anna Fegi. That photo was taken with our personal camera in December 2012 in Cebu City, Philippines. That particular image is used for all public promotions from shows and appearances. Thanks! Adam Brown- Untdrum99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.207.208.234 (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Not that I see, but if @Untdrum99 is Adam Brown (music educator), I would advise him to send confirmation of his identity from an official email address to verify that the account is not impersonation. Relatedly, the photographer of the photos of Brown and Fegi appear to be taken by a third party (the photographer owns the copyright). If the photos were work for hire or if the photographer's copyright was transferred, definitely mention that in the photo's description. czar 22:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 27#File:Anything&whatever.jpg))

File:Anything&whatever.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Calvin44 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Us senate result 1974.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Willhsmit (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, superior version available: File:1974 Senate election map.svg FASTILY 01:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for reference and transfer to Commons. MB298 (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the SVG is better. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 15:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 24#File:Us_senate_result_1972.PNG))

File:Us senate result 1972.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Willhsmit (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Non-circular gear.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Igor Zarebski (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, superior version available: File:Non-circular gear.svg FASTILY 01:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 29#File:Book_of_common_prayer_1662.jpg))

File:Book of common prayer 1662.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ptolemy Caesarion (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 12:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maynemedical.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) 

Ophran Image, not used in wikipedia (talk) 03:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• It's used now on University of Queensland Mayne Medical School--Prisencolin (talk) 05:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Closer's comment - I've reopened this per a request by George Ho on my talk page. The image was de-orphaned, but was then re-orphaned with the claim that it lacked a license, which appears to be an incorrect assessment.— Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 01:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Move/Copy to Commons - If English Wikipedia can't hold the image any longer, Wikimedia Commons should. --George Ho (talk) 01:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. There's no freedom of panorama in Taiwan for sculptures, at least not that we can accept. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 12:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does this lantern resemble the original character design enough to be considered a non-free derivative work? Prisencolin (talk) 05:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless. The lantern is copyrighted on its own. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 00:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 29#File:Menwithmonsters.jpg))

File:Menwithmonsters.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Giantdevilfish (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:NelsonPainting.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChicagoMayne (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphan, and unlikely to be used in the future due to quality issues. In addition, this is likely a copyright violation as a derivative work. The image in the photograph is likely under copyright.  ★  Bigr Tex 23:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Poor quality and a reproduction of a copyrighted work. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 15:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rucka Ali 2016.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NotLessOrEqual (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Licensed under Standard YouTube license, see link. MB298 (talk) 23:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.