< December 19 December 21 >

December 20

File:Bussa.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bussa.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dogfacebob (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bussa statue.png, should possibly be converted to fair use. Magog the Ogre (tc) 01:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Non-free images in "Hollywood Sportatorium"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 15#Non-free_images_in_"Hollywood_Sportatorium"))

File:LedZepAmerica1971.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Edelmand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
File:Sportatorium interior.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jhw57 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Isfahan Metro.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 15#File:Isfahan_Metro.jpg))

File:Isfahan Metro.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AHeneen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Albert Einstein violin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No evidence of publication before 1923, and substantial doubt. See the IP's comments below. ~ Rob13Talk 02:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Einstein violin.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Materialscientist (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image was apparently rejected at Commons, meaning that whilst it would be acceptable locally, the licensing may need to be reviewed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't parse your message above (it makes sense, but does not state the problem with the file - yes, not acceptable on Commons, but acceptable on en.wiki). Materialscientist (talk) 11:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I searched and found the deletion discussion on Commons. The image is in the public domain in the US if it was published (whether in the US or abroad) before 1923. Evidence is needed that the image was published before 1923. AHeneen (talk) 13:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is hard to find pre-1923 Life content online, but This OUP book credits a different crop of the same image as follows: "Photograph from Life Magazine, 1921". Materialscientist (talk) 01:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Albert Einstein portrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No evidence of publication before 1923, and substantial doubt. See the IP's comments below. ~ Rob13Talk 02:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Einstein portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Materialscientist (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This images was claimed to be have been rejected at Commons, which means that whilst it should be acceptable locally, the licensing needs reviewing. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same as above. Materialscientist (talk) 11:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The question is, if this was published in Life magazine, when was that? – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 21:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is hard to find pre-1923 Life content online, but this neuroscience magazine credits this photo as "E. O. Hoppe from a 1921 edition of Life". Materialscientist (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[1] and [2] are the Hathitrust links to 1921 Life. Searching for Einstein yields 19 hits altogether. None of them are relevant. (No hits for Hoppe.) In fact, 1921 Life apparently contains no photographs whatsoever. Getty Images claims licensing rights, gives a Jan 1, 1921 date, attributing the photograph to Hoppe and the LIFE picture collection, not the magazine. Apparently later citations just assumed Life meant the magazine.
So it's not clear when the image was first published. See [3], they had a huge library of unpublished photographs. In addition to the Einstein violin picture next to this discussion, I'll note that [4] is yet another example of a 1921 Einstein image, incorrectly attributed to a 1921 issue of Life magazine.
I'll further note that the photojournalism magazine Life that we all associate with that name was the version created by Luce when he bought it out in 1936. 130.91.118.179 (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rhapsody in Blue bb1-2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 15#File:Rhapsody_in_Blue_bb1-2.png))

File:Rhapsody in Blue bb1-2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dono (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Still from silent film A Dash of Courage (1916).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 03:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Still from silent film A Dash of Courage (1916).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Isaidnoway (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I fail to see how a 1916 publicity still/or frame from a US film needs to be under 'fair use' as it's pre 1923. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:How Girls Can Help to Build Up the Empire.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by Edgar181 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 15:08, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:How Girls Can Help to Build Up the Empire.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gobonobo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Metadata given suggests copyright had now expired? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the copyright has now expired. I've uploaded this to Commons under the same file name and requested that it be speedily deleted. gobonobo + c 18:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stema e Bashkisë Belsh.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 15#File:Stema_e_Bashkisë_Belsh.svg))

File:Stema e Bashkisë Belsh.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kj1595 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taffychristifn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 22:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taffychristifn.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Schmausschmaus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Tagged with NFUR not needed, but NFUR given. No notice license? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Uploader udpated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taffyflyer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 22:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taffyflyer.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Schmausschmaus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No notice license, but NFUR given nontheless. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:42, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Uploader udpated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taffyflyer2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 22:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taffyflyer2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Schmausschmaus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No notice license, but NFUR given... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Uploader udpated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saltsign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. The uploader's editing history indicates that he took the pictures himself Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saltsign.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sundropman05 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Refferal as this was tagged wrong license Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sir Orfeo, first page, Auchinleck.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Not clear from the nomination why PD-Art would not apply Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Orfeo, first page, Auchinleck.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Choor monster (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Metadata queries licensing. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maurice Ravel - Thérèse Dussaut - Pavane pour une infante défunte.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn -FASTILY 03:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maurice Ravel - Thérèse Dussaut - Pavane pour une infante défunte.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Adam Cuerden (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Metadata claims this apparently expired in france at the start of 2016. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to throw a ((KeepLocal)) on it - mainly just as we know 100% it's safe under American copyright law, but I'm not an expert in French - , but by all means let's copy it to Commons as well. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn tagged keep local. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taffygar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 06:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taffygar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Schmausschmaus (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No notice license, but NFUR provided. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn Uploader udpated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Pearce article.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Pearce article.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FinnRiver180 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uncropped duplicate of David Pearce Boxer Tribute 180.jpeg -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Pearce Fight picture.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Pearce Fight picture.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FinnRiver180 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uncropped duplicate of David Pearce Fight Picture.jpeg -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:12, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manhattancollege1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 04:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manhattancollege1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Brian.t.oconnor (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, would have moved to Commons but tagged keep local. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can still move it to Commons... Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Artati Marzuki-Sudirjo, Sang Saka Melanglang Djagad, p14.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 14:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artati Marzuki-Sudirjo, Sang Saka Melanglang Djagad, p14.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Crisco 1492 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Inconsistent dates for copyright expiry, which is correct? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC) (Ammmended (See below) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

additional -


Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And also inconsistent expiry dates :-

And so on...

Needs wholescale review of contributors uploads (sigh) :( Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nikkimaria has previously done image reviews for several similar images, and she has not had an issue with such templating. Similarly affected images (albeit PD under the 2002/2014 copyright laws, example) have passed FPC on Commons.
Many of these have since fallen out of copyright under the 2002 and 2014 law (which also applies 50 years after publication for photographs) and can be uploaded to Commons now. At worst, there are some where the dates need to be cleaned up either owing to sloppy copying of the templates/boilerplate text (mea culpa) or the fact that the "Do not move to commons" template automatically adds 1. That can be handled without deletion.
Withdrawn - Uploader has updated files for consistency, and a number should now be moved to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nipple by Joss Redfern.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nipple by Joss Redfern.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JossDude (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Refferal to FFD, I don't see how this image is useful to the encylopedia, but it IS in use on the uploader's page.

The image is also low quality, compared to others on Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not the place to host pictures of everyone's nipples. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 22:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UP Carillon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Seems like the difference does not matter for copyright status. Will also change the template use a little Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:UP Carillon.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gen 89 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Where did the 1979 date for this having expired come from? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have thought it should be 1978, 25 years from 1952 construction. Ask User:King of Hearts.[5]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Monument of Missouri.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 04:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument of Missouri.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Labattblueboy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not understanding why the copyright expires in 2015, for an architect/creator who died in 1976. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cubao Cathedral (side view).JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep and relicense as ((PD-Philippines)) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cubao Cathedral (side view).JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nasugbu batangas (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I'm not understanding where the 1976 date comes from on this. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

25 years after 1950 construction in Philippines. Thincat (talk) 21:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Destination maps.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Term refers to maps containing destinations, not to maps from a given source. This map appears to be derived from File:Europe blank laea location map.svg so not unfree Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Destination maps.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Christopher 905 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Source is attributed to "Destination maps", possible derivative of non-free content FASTILY 22:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.