< September 28 September 30 >

September 29

File:Slow worm photographed in Skellingthorpe, UK, July 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slow worm photographed in Skellingthorpe, UK, July 2014.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DJC Skellingthorpe (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused, blurry. Clearer photos available in Commons:Category:Anguis. Kelly hi! 00:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and transfer to Commons. MB298 (talk) 00:43, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We shouldn't keep every photo just because it is free. If there are better alternative available, which there are, and it isn't being used, which it isn't, delete it. --Majora (talk) 02:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SCE KUNV Lion.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:SCE KUNV Lion.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RockinRob (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo is of a 3D sculpture and has been uploaded as "own work" under ((cc-by-sa-2.5)). The photo itself is fine to claim as own work, but unless statue depicted in the photo probably should be assumed to be still under copyright protection unless it can be clearly shown otherwise. Freedom of paranoia exemptions are given in the US to buildings, etc., but not for artworks and sculptures, even those permanently installed in public places, according to c:COM:FOP#United States. This might make it necessary to treat the lion sculpture as non-free, which means that a valid non-free use rationale would need to be provided and a ((Non-free 3D art)) license added for the sculpture. The way the photo is currently being used in University Park Airport, however, seems pretty decorative and unlikely to satisfy WP:NFCC#8. Moreover, much better information about the copyright status of the statue itself would need to be provided as explained in WP:NFCC#10a. So, I suggest delete unless it can be clarified beyond doubt that the lion statue is old enough for public domain per ((PD-art-3d)) or some other type of free license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:42, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, you may also be interested to find out that it is published one other place, the park university site (it isnt available currently, however tin eye did find it.)[1]

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George Bush Intercontinental Airport (logo).svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep only on Houston Airport System Majora (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:George Bush Intercontinental Airport (logo).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free logo being used in Houston Airport System, Ellington Airport (Texas), George Bush Intercontinental Airport, and William P. Hobby Airport. A non-free use rationale is provided for each use, but if the logo's design is too complex for ((PD-logo)), then only the non-free use in the article about the airport system seems WP:NFCC compliant. Each of the individual airports appear to be under the management of the Houston Airport System (a part of local city government), which means they could be considered child entities per No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. Logos specific to each airport could be used if they exist, but even if the do not then default is not automatic use of the parent entity logo per WP:NFCC#3. Moreover, the logo itself makes no mention of any of the individual airports so trying to claim it is needed for identification purpose even within the main infobox seems a bit of a stretch per WP:NFCC#8 and removing the logo would not be detrimental at all to the reader's understanding. Finally, there's nothing about this logo that cannot be expressed in text given the way it's currently being used in the airport articles which means it also probably doesn't satisfy WP:NFCC#1. Suggest keep for "Houston Airport System", but remove from the individual airport logos. Also, suggest renaming the logo per WP:FNC#3 since the name seems a bit misleading given the actual logo being depicted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:50, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sticky Studios taken from the Sticky Studios car park.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 17:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sticky Studios taken from the Sticky Studios car park.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jimmy Slippy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The uploader is Jimmy Slippy, who claims he took the photo in 2014 and owns the copyright. However, the EXIF data shows this image was taken by Carey Sheffield in 2011, and that "THIS IMAGE IS COPYRIGHT PROTECTED". Unless Jimmy Slippy can supply evidence that he received permission to upload this photo under the claimed license, Sheffield's rights are being infringed upon. — ξxplicit 06:01, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chucktownriverdoges.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 17:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chucktownriverdoges.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Yoshi032192 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused, likely no encyclopedic use. Kelly hi! 12:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Church 193.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 7#File:Church_193.jpg))

File:Church 193.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hamilti (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tithe barn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 7#File:Tithe_barn.jpg))

File:Tithe barn.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Joe Scofield (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Church of Saint Nectan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 16:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Church of Saint Nectan.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MHenbert (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete - unused, low quality (particularly the lower portion). Clearer images available in Commons:Category:St Nectan's Church, Hartland, Devon. In particular, File:The Church of St Nectan in Stoke near Hartland, Devon (geograph 4558235).jpg is a photo from approximately the same angle. Kelly hi! 13:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Usafm16.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Usafm16.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Great Scott (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, superior version available: File:Usafm16.svg FASTILY 23:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I see that the Commons file attributes this file, is this a reason for keeping?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFIS Reverse.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:IFIS Reverse.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Denelson83 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, superior version available: File:IFIS Reverse.svg FASTILY 23:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I see that the Commons file attributes this file, is this a reason for keeping?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and transfer to Commons. MB298 (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ireland road lanes.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 08:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ireland road lanes.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zoney (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, superior version available: File:Ireland Road Lanes.svg FASTILY 23:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I see that the Commons file attributes this file, is this a reason for keeping?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and transfer to Commons. MB298 (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFIS Variant.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:IFIS Variant.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Denelson83 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
Unused, superior version available: File:IFIS Variant.svg FASTILY 23:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I see that the Commons file attributes this file, is this a reason for keeping?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and transfer to Commons. MB298 (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.