The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garfield - Caught in the Act design meeting notes.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by KGRAMR (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I am contesting that this image meets NFCC criteria 8. The notes depict the Catsablanca scene, of which all the article has to says is "many of the original ideas were scrapped due to not being fun such as the train segment in "Catsablanca", which was implemented early but ultimately deemed not satisfactory for the final version".

The file's increase does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission is not detrimental to that understanding.

It's also unreadable at a file size that's allowed on the project (< 100,000 pixels). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NFCC#8. buidhe 08:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The design note shows ideas that were originally planned but never fully implemented into the final game such as the Train segment in the "Catsablanca" level (its shown pretty blatantly in the notes and coupled with the date shown in it, tell us that the section was planned early on).... Roberth Martinez (talk) 20:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per NFCC#8. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiphopfilms0.1.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Irondavy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

WP:IINFO, WP:OR, corresponding article List of films with associated hip hop songs at AfD. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:38, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete obvious OR. (Note: Most charts are free due to not meeting threshold of originality. If you see a similar chart in a published source, it can often be uploaded to commons as PD-chart. Then it is not OR but someone else's research). buidhe 08:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as OR. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kelly Swanson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kelly Swanson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unencyclopedic, only used on user page by inactive user who has made few other edits. – Fayenatic London 10:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, seems to have been here solely to write about himself; his article was speedied in November 2012 per A7. Note also that his userpage is up for speedy deletion per U5. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:11, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as per User:LaundryPizza03. User hasn't made any edits since November 2012. Picture violates WP:NOTWEBHOST JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 April 10. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:FMovies Homepage Screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 April 10. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:HeartcatchPreCure.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Comment: This file looks like cover art for a DVD/Blu-ray or something. Cover art is used to identify things, so perhaps this file should serve to identify the anime in question. «ias!|_,,.|^usbk» 23:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Detian Falls 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pottera (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, low quality image. Certainly cannot be qualified at WikiCommons, which hosts other, more better-quality pics of the same subject at Commons:Category:Ban Gioc Waterfalls. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.