The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:38, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aslam Pahalwan.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Faridzenger (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo from 1967, source country either UK or Pakistan. The author is unclear and it's hard to say if it was ever published. (Pakistan uses 50 years from publication for all photographs, and UK copyright depends on date of creation and publication.) US copyright was likely restored by the URAA, but it's hard to be sure. Without evidence of publication, WP:NFCC#4 is hard to prove. I suggest delete. Wikiacc (¶) 00:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe @LM2000: has something to say. He is good with old pictures. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Unfortunately, I don't think there is enough information given to determine whether this is actually in the public domain or not. So I'd have to support deletion.LM2000 (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:EdmontonFlag2019.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Natster101 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Works of Canadian city governments are not public domain. Delete since File:Flag of Edmonton.svg exists. Wikiacc (¶) 00:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Pembrokeshire.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Poiuytre (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Flag of Pembrokeshire, Wales, designed 1970s by Peter Stock. Claimed to be in the public domain, but without evidence. Even if it's a government work, it's under Crown Copyright until sometime later in the decade. See c:COM:United Kingdom. (It might qualify for ((PD-ineligible-USonly)), but the design is somewhat complex.) Wikiacc (¶) 00:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The the UK Flag Registry page on the Flag Institute website states "The flags of modern administrative entities (e.g. local authorities) and flags subject to copyright restrictions are excluded." The Flag of Pembrokeshire is included in the registry suggesting that it is free of copyright restrictions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note this is a duplicate of File:FlagOfPembrokeshire.PNG / File:Flag of Pembrokeshire.svg on Commons. The former is tagged as public domain. Thryduulf (talk) 22:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:George Bernard Shaw's speech about what to do with the unproductive.ogv (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Modern Major General (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This video clip appears to come from a 1931 British newsreel. (It contains video and audio of Shaw speaking and music of unknown origin.) It's unclear exactly how UK copyright applies to films, but UK copyright likely expired in 2002. Therefore US copyright was likely restored by the URAA, making it copyrighted in the US until 2027. Wikiacc (¶) 01:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xbox Series S Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nakita Kelley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Copyrighted image (from Microsoft) of a released console, which we already have free images of, so we cannot have non-free images per NFCC#1. Masem (t) 16:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Note also this is not a logo and the logo rationale is wrong. -- ferret (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xbox SeriesX Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nakita Kelley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Copyrighted image (from Microsoft) of a released console, which we already have free images of, so we cannot have non-free images per NFCC#1. Masem (t) 16:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Note also this is not a logo and the logo rationale is wrong. -- ferret (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xbox Series XS Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nakita Kelley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Copying Masem's rationale for the other two that the user uploaded: Copyrighted image (from Microsoft) of a released console, which we already have free images of, so we cannot have non-free images per NFCC#1. Note additonally that the name and rationale provided, that this is a "logo", is incorrect. -- ferret (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ap munich905 t.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DrBat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Contrary to the purported non-free use rationale, the image is *NOT* used to complement a discussion about the impact the image itself had, but it *IS* used to illustrate the event depicted (the Munich massacre). This does not appear to justify the use of a non-free image. Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 18:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I concur with the nominator. This is an Associated Press image that has a caption, but no discussion about the image in the body of the article. The two sources for the cation seem superfluous as they include the image but do not discuss the image beyond also having captions. Fails WP:NFCC#2 as this is an image from a commercial photo agency. -- Whpq (talk) 19:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.