May 11
File:Servo logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Servo logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
the copyrighted element doesn't pass c:COM:De minimis 49.145.229.96 (talk) 01:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The image of the viral Dogge is copyrighted. See also c:COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. Doubtful also if it can be converted as fair use here because it is unused as of this writing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:37, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Phipps pittsburgh winter show.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Phipps pittsburgh winter show.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cmouse (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This is an image of a three dimensional work of art, and therefore a derivative image. In the United States there is no Freedom of Panorama for works of art other than buildings, so the question becomes whether the work of art is de minimis in the image. I lean towards that it is not and thus should be deleted, but am looking for additional opinions. ★ Bigr Tex 02:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned, should probably be licensed as non-free 3D art as the main focus is the swan display. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Pse ayala front center.gif
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pse ayala front center.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LordAntagonist (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Possibly suspicious image: the Contact Us page of the official website of PSE bears this image that, if downloaded, has identical resolution (230x284px). The only difference is the file format, but I suspect this enwiki hosted file as radically edited one (the original is .jpg, this one is .gif). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Phil stock exchange plaza.jpg
File:Rcbc plaza.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rcbc plaza.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ewanko (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
An identical image is found at https://www.office-hub.com/ph/buildings/yuchengco-tower-makati-manila-a363m000001SLGjAAO, where the resolution is 960×1280px (larger than this file which is at 600x800px). Own work status becomes doubtful. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, even if it were own work [edit: should be deleted on the grounds of not being own work, per nom], the copyright is owned by the architects due to lack of freedom of panorama in the Philippines (c:COM:FOP Philippines). -M.Nelson (talk) 11:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @M.nelson: FOP basis is not applicable for this nomination, as enwiki only respects US law and applies US architectural FOP to all unfree buildings from no FOP countries. That's why enwiki has w:File:Burj Khalifa.jpg but Commons deleted their copy of it. However, I aired my concern at Template talk:FoP-USonly#On images tagged with FoP-USonly, because while enwiki only follows US law, it is accessible in countries where US law does not apply, like ours (we use English Wikipedia more than Tagalog Wikipedia, which is not accessed by 9 out of 10 Filipinos, pageview stats verify this). My concern wasn't noticed, however, and eventually I decided a compromise proposal to reword the template (at Template talk:FoP-USonly#Suggested revised wording), to add a warning for people from no FOP countries tonot reuse the unfree buildings' images here for commercial purposes. You may want to air your inputs there. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting, thank you, I didn't realize that - I'm used to FOP on Commons. I'll read that discussion and participate if I can. I agree that the image likely isn't the uploader's own work and should be deleted anyway. -M.Nelson (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:GermanFlamethrower.jpg
