The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cleo Smith police image.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LivelyRatification (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free image of (known) living person, completely disallowed by NFCC#1 Masem (t) 01:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, given that she's now confirmed to be definitely alive, this image should be taken down. --LivelyRatification (talk) 01:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melanie Pearson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Raintheone (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The use of the image no longer complies with the use rationale given: "The image contributes significantly to the article as it is being used to identify and illustrate the subject of the article, Melanie Pearson, in the character infobox and holds no decorative purpose." The image is now decorative and should either be deleted, or returned to the infobox and the new image deleted. Adam Black GB (talk) 04:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washington small.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LeonisRugitur (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Do we really need this low-resolution picture? Can't it simply be replaced by one of the images in c:Category:George Washington (Gilbert Stuart - Metropolitan Museum of Art)? Stefan2 (talk) 13:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Replace it in the userspace with File:George Washington, 1795 by Gilbert Stuart.jpg (simplist one in the category in my opinion) and delete the File:Washington small.jpg as redundant. Salavat (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide types.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Spencerk (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to non-free -FASTILY 08:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:WholeShabang.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jgera5 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Derivative work of copyrighted packaging. Could probably qualify for fair use, though. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to non-free -FASTILY 08:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nuteena-can.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcneda (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Derivative work of copyrighted packaging. Could probably qualify for fair use, though. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It must qualify for fair use; there are many similar pictures included in the Coca Cola article that must have navigated the same issue. Mcneda (talk) 18:35, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mcneda: I don't think it's an issue in your particular example as the Coca-Cola logo is too simple for copyright protection. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicense to non-free product cover or non-free fair use in and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:MazonotBread.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xyz7890 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Packaging is likely copyrighted. Image is blurry and not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Latoified Wikipedia.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Esquivalience (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Probably a copyright violation. Because content on Wikipedia is available under a share-alike license, the uploader cannot release derivative works under CC0. We can't simply change the license on this file because "viral" licenses are not automatic. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• What it means is that the uploader has made his contribution to the image available under the cc-zero licence. It is also necessary to respect the licences of the underlying works (text+images) and attribute the authors. However, I don't see how it matters to us that the uploader indicated the wrong licence as it is permitted to combine cc-zero with cc-by-sa content. It is a problem for the uploader as violating the cc-by-sa licence means that the licence is terminated for the uploader, so the uploader shouldn't be able to use the material again, but this doesn't affect anyone else. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:31, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:52, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of F.G. Public High School Mardan.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Adil Shah of Mardan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Complex logo, no evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Logo is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luganda book Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mark Mulwanyi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused book cover, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Ipso Facto copyvio. The book is copyright Hamis Kiggundu. the uploader is not Kiggundu, and was paid to write about him. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 18:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birth to 36 months boys length-weight clinical growth chart.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Julijewelz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.