< September 21	September 23 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The ineligible items listed at c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Lebanon#Not protected all seem to be texts and speeches and probably doesn't include images. Stefan2 (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus public domain claim. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus public domain claim. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If not published as stated on the file information page, then the copyright expires 120 years after creation, and the year of creation is unknown. Also potentially out of scope - Draft:Magdalene Harriet May Capes was deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

c:COM:Ghana does not list stamps as ineligible for copyright protection. Stefan2 (talk) 00:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 00:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus public domain reason. Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Stefan2: It has already been duplicated. Go ahead and delete it please. scope_creep^Talk 00:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See c:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unfocused, not worth moving to Commons. ✗plicit 12:52, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, poor quality and orphaned with no obvious value to Commons. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

C:COM:TOYS. ✗plicit 13:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It says Original publication: Circassian Organisation (gives full permission to use all images) but there is no way to verify this and it is unclear what "use" means. The image is listed as being unfree, but fails WP:NFCC#1 if there's no permission from the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted album cover, no evidence uploader is designer. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled non-free album cover for which the associated article is a redirect. Salavat (talk) 14:52, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete local copy as duplicate of Commons file. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr URL points at a different photo. Stefan2 (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file which appears to be correctly sourced and licensed. Salavat (talk) 14:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aderonke Adeniyi Esther. Stefan2 (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aderonke Adeniyi Esther. Also wrong licence (it's ((cc-zero)) on Flickr). Stefan2 (talk) 17:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overwritten file: two in one. Are these screenshots from some unidentified TV programme? Flickrwashing? Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 17:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted on Flickr. Unverifiable licence. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that flickrphoto:525130708 has been deleted on Flickr. Also, the Wikipedia uploader mentions two different licences, but neither of them is normally available on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at flickruser:27297239@N07, I get the feeling that the pictures uploaded by this Flickr user might be screenshots from unidentified films. Stefan2 (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Tagged with NC/ND restrictions on Flickr at time of writing. No prejudice to restoration if the license on Flickr is updated to remove these restrictions. -FASTILY 23:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is listed as cc-by-nc-nd on Flickr.

The uploader used a ((self)) template, thus claiming to be the uploader. However, there is no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. The usernames differ quite a bit - Playclever on Wikipedia, Jon Kneller on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added a comment on Wikipedia to confirm that this was me Playclever (talk) 19:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Playclever: Please also consider dropping the non-commercial and no-derivatives restrictions on Flickr. Permission to use the file "on Wikipedia" is not considered free enough to meet the definition of a free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Another issue that needs to be addressed is whether the sculpture is old enough to be in public domain or located in a country with freedom of panorama for 3D artworks. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FOP: This is Bargate in the United Kingdom, isn't it? You can see similar lions on File:Bargate 2021.JPG if you look at the right place. There is also discussion about lion statues in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, freedom of panorama shouldn't be an issue. COM:FOP UK indicates that 3D works are allowed. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The uploads by flickruser:alexconst make me feel uncomfortable. Magazine covers, articles, advertisements. I suspect that much of the user's uploads aren't own work. Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This exact file is at Commons under File:Bloodhound_Gang_-_2126673614.jpg, other files by this Flickr user have been imported to Commons [1]. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 23:31, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to [2], Football League Review 1968/69 Volume 3 Number 28. Brentford inside forward Bobby Ross. In other words, not own work by the Flickr uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:57, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been deleted on Flickr, so the licence can't be verified. Also, it's a derivative work. Stefan2 (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Converted to non-free -FASTILY 23:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, mislabelled non-free file so I have relicensed to non-free poster and added a fairuse. Salavat (talk) 14:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to have been deleted from Flickr, so the licence can't be verified. Stefan2 (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 00:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is listed as cc-by-nd on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been deleted on Flickr. Also, why would a Flickr user be the copyright holder to this material? Stefan2 (talk) 18:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been deleted on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 19:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been deleted on Flickr, so the licence can't be verified. Stefan2 (talk) 19:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been deleted on Flickr, so the licence can't be verified. Stefan2 (talk) 19:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have altered the licence to CC-by-SA although I don't see why Wikipedia cannot use CC-by-NC licensing. M Baldwin-Edwards.
Comment, the image is apparently from c. 1900 so it could possible be licensed under PD-old. This image is apparently based on a photograph from 1898. Salavat (talk) 00:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice if WP could obey the copyright laws of various countries, instead of trying to make up laws for themselves. I assert my copyrights against the criminal conduct of WP perverts. If you don't accept the Creative Commons licence, then STFU. 176.58.193.205 (talk) 21:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Problem solved. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See c:COM:FOP United States. Stefan2 (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that Florida has c:Template:PD-FLGov – The Grid (talk) 12:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Right. I forgot about that. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP. Stefan2 (talk) 19:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of a painting or something. Stefan2 (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP. Stefan2 (talk) 19:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is listed as cc-by-nc-nd on Flickr. The uploader claims to have permission, but the linked permission image has been deleted. I found a copy here. The permission apparently applies to "the photos linked in your message" but it does not say which photos were linked. The permission also doesn't seem to extend to anyone other than the Wikipedia uploader. The exact implications of the word "use" are also unclear. Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The permission statement is definitely not sufficient, it does not mention the ability to, reuse it outside Wikipedia, commercially, or create derivatives, and the permission only seems to apply to the editor themselves. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 23:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is listed as cc-by-nc on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: There is no FOP for 3D works in the US. No prejudice to restoration if someone is able to create a valid fair use claim for the article(s) the file is used on. -FASTILY 05:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP. Could be used under WP:NFCC in Tree of Life (Disney), remove from the other pages. Stefan2 (talk) 20:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update license - Replace in usage with File:-DISNEY'S ANIMAL KINGDOM ENTRANCE - panoramio.jpg on other pages or something similar, to keep the thematics.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Flickr URL. Stefan2 (talk) 20:07, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is a non-commercial Creative Commons license in the metadata, this license is not considered to be free though. And the Flickr URL is not correct as said, so there is no evidence of any free license. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 23:08, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted on Flickr. Not possible to verify the licence. Stefan2 (talk) 20:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep File:Dr Jerry Pournelle at BayCon 2006 cropped.jpg, delete File:Dr Jerry Pournelle at BayCon 2006.jpg. The Wayback Machine links provided by Dylsss indicate the cropped version to be licensed cc-by-sa-2.0, however, I do not see permission for the full-res version. No prejudice to restoration of the full-res version if someone can provide a source/citation explicitly proving it to be free. -FASTILY 05:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted on Flickr. Not possible to verify the licence. Stefan2 (talk) 20:16, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: We have a record of the license. Our due diligence is done. There are processes for a copyright holder to follow. The responsibility now lies with the copyright holder. —¿philoserf? (talk) 15:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Where is the record of the licence? Unlike Commons, Wikipedia doesn't have a licence reviewing process. Besides, the licence indicated in the licensing section on the file information pages is not normally offered on Flickr. I note that a different licence is mentioned in the permission field in the information template. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20190120235645/https://www.flickr.com/photos/null0/2223072576/ and https://web.archive.org/web/20080131102849/http://www.flickr.com/photos/null0/ (first image) with cc-by-sa-2.0 licensing. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 22:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It looks like the photo has been deleted from Flickr. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

September 22

File:Logo de la Chambre des Deputes libanaise.png

File:Logo Crédit Agricole 1959.jpeg

File:Logo Crédit Agricole 1948.jpg

File:Portrait photo of Harriet in later years.jpg

File:Postage Stamp - Dr. Kwame Nkrumah Gold Cup - 1959.jpg

File:Potrait of Surya Ganguli.jpg

File:Praun Russian Campaign 1941-1942 Chart 9.png

File:Siliqua Valentinian III.jpg

File:Court Office L'Orignal 3.JPG

File:Berlindiorama.jpg

File:JembulatBoletoko.jpg

File:Amanda Kay EP Cover.png

File:Alberto Santos-Dumont 1910 circa.jpg

File:Aderonke Adeniyi and Actor Funsho Adeolu on set of Our Wife.jpg

File:Aderonke Adeniyi.jpeg

File:Aderonke Adeniyi's Movie 'Our Wife.jpeg

File:4413086138 29390ab733.jpg

File:BetTzedekHousingConditions.gif

File:Beasties3.png

File:Bargate Lion.jpg

File:BloodhoundGangBandFlic.jpg

File:Bobby Ross, Brentford FC footballer, 1968.jpg

File:Bolasspider.jpg

File:Bip!.jpg

File:Bigbang Japan Dome Tour X 2014-15.jpg

File:BetTzedekKinshipCare.jpg

File:Budapest Opera interior.jpg

File:Brentford v Grazer Sportklub programme, 1955.jpg

File:CIGI Composition.jpg

File:CIGI-Campus-Creative-Commons.jpg

File:CIGI-Atrium-Creative-Commons.jpg

File:Central Athens 1900.jpg

File:City seal bartow.jpg

File:Chuck Klein WOF.jpg

File:Coral Nebula Aelita Andre.jpg

File:Curt Simmons plaque.jpg

File:Cubs-barrett2.jpg

File:Crop of Giles Panton.jpeg

File:Disney Animal Kingdom (27589660700).jpg

File:Dianthus-plumarius-plant.jpg

File:Delta Upsilon pinning.jpg

File:Dr Jerry Pournelle at BayCon 2006 cropped.jpg

File:Downtown Phoenix Dusk 2006.jpg