< September 5	September 7 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other than possibly the stylised n and x, I am not seeing anything that's really over the threshold of originallity here. Why is this under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled pd-logo. Replace logo with the Commons based file. Salavat (talk) 00:12, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/Copyright_threshold_of_originality_for_logos says that text is generally only copyrightable when combined with shapes. --GRuban (talk) 03:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other than the back gradient, I am seeing a text-logo, why is this under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to pd-logo and copy to Commons. Salavat (talk) 00:12, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons considers this to potentially be PD (c:File:Ethel Ernestine Harper (1903-1979) in 1932.png ) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not seeing anything here that makes this non-simple. Commons c:File:Logo Formel 2.png considers this simple. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't a work by an artist that died in 1944 now PD? (If so do we have a Hi-res version of this?) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - ((PD-old-70)) but based on rationale provided for other European artists of this period , ((Not-PD-US-URAA)) applies so can't be moved to Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete local copy as duplicate of Commons file. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was seemingly kept as a text logo at Commons. c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Geni Logo.png . ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled pd-logo. Replace logo with the Commons based file. Salavat (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Under CC-BY-SA-4.0 at Commons, Other than possibly the sylized G, I'm seeing a text logo. Why is this under NFCC locally? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not actionable. Nominated for DR on Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file ends up being kept -FASTILY 23:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other than the pill shaped background, this is a text logo. c:File:GISAID logo.png was considered "simple". ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PD-FLGov - c:File:Glen Edward Rogers.jpg but lacking a source on Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not actionable. Nominated for DR on Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file ends up being kept -FASTILY 23:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other than the stylized i (at end), I'm seeing a text logo, why is this under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am seeing a text logo. Why is this under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled pd-logo. Replace logo with the Commons based file. Salavat (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete local copy as duplicate of Commons file. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a textlogo, Why is it under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete local copy as duplicate of Commons file. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a text logo on a flag? Why is this under NFCC, when the equivalent on Commons is considered 'simple'? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not actionable. Nominated for DR on Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file ends up being kept -FASTILY 23:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly a text logo, Is the positioning sufficent to tip it over TOO? If not then why is this under NFCC? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not actionable. Nominated for DR on Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file ends up being kept -FASTILY 04:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is was published in 1926 and the subject has been dead since 1958, Why would this not be PD under the relevant wording in PD-India? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not actionable. Nominated for DR on Commons, we can revisit this matter if the Commons file ends up being kept -FASTILY 23:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a text cover. (c:File:Маленькая барабанщица.jpg is considered simple)? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons considers this as Not renewed. Why is it under NFCC locally? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons consider this to be a Califronia govt work. c:File:Juanita Spinelli (criminal).png) . Is there a reason why this is not correct? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 October 10. FASTILY 09:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gojira - Ocean Planet.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 October 10. FASTILY 09:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZTE Orbit phone.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. There is a rough consensus that the fair use rationale for this file in the given article is appropriate. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 01:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like commons file, File:In the bleak midwinter (Harold Darke).ogg, this work is copyrighted in the UK and there is no fair use rationale. The musical content does not require an audio sample and it is not discussed sufficiently in the article it is being used in. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The file is indeed copyrighted, which is why it is a 29-second extract, in line with WP:NFCCEG:

"Music clips may be used to identify a musical style, group, or iconic piece of music when accompanied by appropriate sourced commentary and attributed to the copyright holder. Samples should generally not be longer than 30 seconds or 10% of the length of the original song, whichever is shorter." Whether this is "discussed sufficiently in the article" is a subjective point - there is a 150-word paragraph discussing Darke's arrangement If this is insufficient depth, the answer would be to improve the article, not delete the file.

There is a Fair Use Rationale for this article - it is provided by the template ((Non-free use rationale 2)). If you would like this information to be duplicated in a separate ((Non-free use rationale)) template, then I am happy to do this.

The musical content does require an audio sample as this supports the reader's understanding of the differences between the two settings.

Cnbrb (talk) 08:36, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 19:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – the fair-use rationale strikes me as reasonable: since the musical properties of the tune are discussed in the article, the recording has contextual significance. All of the other criteria seem to be pretty clearly met, so there's no apparent reason for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 October 10. FASTILY 09:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Love Train - O'Jays.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own-work claim, originally uploaded as File:BasharRahal1.jpg, where the uploader claimed "aut[h]orized by the owner" with an IMDb link, indicating this is the work of someone else. ✗plicit 23:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

September 6

File:Enel X logo.png

File:EthelErnestineHarper1932.png

File:FIA Formula 2 Championship logo.png

File:GeniLogo.png

File:Gisaid logo.png

File:Gupielectionsymbol.jpg

File:IZM magazine logo.png

File:Inter+ canada logo.PNG

File:Israel-national-union001.png

File:John F. Simms.jpg

File:Juanita Spinella (criminal).png

File:ZTE Orbit phone.jpg

File:Love Train - O'Jays.jpg

File:Rahal new Headshot.jpg