The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 February 20. ✗plicit 00:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Call the Midwife first paperback ed 2002.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Call the Midwife 2007 reissue ed Orion.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indianschoolmural.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jupiter68776 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in India, needs evidence that the mural is old enough to be in public domain. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:IntelliSTAR HD.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Curtjr4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Screen capture of copyrighted TV program. Copyright issues aside, the photo is of low quality and not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: procedural close. File was never properly tagged with ((ffd)) and is tagged for lacking a license anyway, so its deletion is forthcoming. ✗plicit 03:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file origin is unknown, year the photo was taken is also unknown. Author is unspecified. Could still be under copyright.Crook1 (talk) 03:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:House Keeper.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Status (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Currently used in Good Article "Personal (album)". Portion heard in the sample easily conveyed in text, or insufficiently supported by sourced critical commentary. Not contextually significant to the whole album. Also, critical commentary insufficient in the song article House Keeper (song), which isn't using the sample at the moment. George Ho (talk) 05:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Depeche mode barrel of a gun.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Epolk (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Song portion heard in sample insufficiently supported by critical commentary, or easily conveyed in text. Not contextually significant to Depeche Mode and Barrel of a Gun (Depeche Mode song). George Ho (talk) 05:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Indeed, there is information about the song's meaning on its article, but the sample and article text are misaligned. A different sample that encapsulates the lyrical meaning may be able to work in the future, but for Depeche Mode's article, nothing supports the audio clip, so that one should most definitely go. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Diamondstone.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kingofthedead (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File no longer meets WP:NFCC#1, as it has been replaced by an image that is in the public domain. Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 February 20. ✗plicit 00:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isanyoneup screen.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parks and recreation the banquet.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Illustrates a blond woman's man-ish (or boyish) haircut and an embarassed woman together in the scene. I was initially reluctant to list this at FFD, assuming that the scene would be hard to convey in text or that the text about the whole episode or the whole scene doesn't provide the same conveyance as this image. However, many screenshots, including of the Parks and Recreation episodes, have been deleted in other FFD discussions. As I must say, I have no objections to deletion if no one else objects, if failure to comply with NFCC is implied, and if being not contextually significant to the whole episode is implied. George Ho (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.