The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Above Horizons (CeCe Peniston song - sample).ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 1BlueBerry (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Insufficiently supported by critical commentary, or easily conveyed in text. Not contextually significant to Above Horizons. George Ho (talk) 00:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:GoldFlake Lights.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Freakyyash (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused derivative work of presumably copyrighted packaging. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Huangyida43.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jingstatic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Seems to be a selfie of Yida Huang, as such, this is not an own work. Permission needed for base file needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 February 7. ✗plicit 06:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kate Bush - Running Up That Hill.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bpokhara.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Santmail (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedroeustache.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cricket02 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

2 issues. Original file is a fair use file. Current version has no permission. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juliet Winters Carpenter.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Iwanafish (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Conflicting license. Uploaded with ((PD-self)) & fair use. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green-tinged avatar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Imjasonn (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No permission/source for base avatar. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:ES-Army-OF3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Karabinier (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

2 problems. 1. Non-photographs should be in PNG/SVG. 2. OF3 is the rank of Major. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:ES-Army-OF7.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Karabinier (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

2 problems. 1. Non-photographs should be in PNG/SVG. 2. OF7 is the rank of Major General. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mulia Putra at Dec 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by T-1000i (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aurelio Lampredi e Gioachino Colombo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Typ932 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

possible copyvio, unable to verify PD-Italy claim, missing both a verifiable source and publication date FASTILY 08:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birendra Bhuyan.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Soumya chand (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

scanned historical photo of a notable individual, dubious own work claim FASTILY 10:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicense to non-free biog pic and add a fair use. A lack of a verifiable source might be an issue though. Salavat (talk) 14:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  It is definitely an issue. While converting to fair use would alleviate the copyright concern I've raised, all Wikipedia content must still be based on verifiable & reliable sources. Without that, this might as well be original research. -FASTILY 23:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to ((PD-ineligible-USonly)). No comment on ((PD-UK-typographical-25)) eligibility, however anyone is free to transfer if you're confident about this. -FASTILY 01:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cilla-black-youve-lost-that-lovin-feelin-1965.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shoot for the Stars (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Must have been taken from 45cat instead of "Scan from the original cover" as claimed. Nonetheless, I think the label has nothing creative and complex enough for US copyright. Information is too factual, the background is plain, and text doesn't contain lyrics. Unsure whether it is copyrighted in the UK, but there are other images using one of Parlaphone logos in Commons: c:Category:Parlophone. Also, another Parlophone logo is considered free to use. Furthermore, published editions have 25-year British copyright protection. The label's UK copyright as a published edition has expired already. If ineligible for UK copyright, then the image should be transferred to Commons. Otherwise, mark it as "PD-ineligible-USonly". George Ho (talk) 11:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Concur. Copyright has expired in the UK and never existed in the first place in the US due to threshold of originality. I deliberately express no opinion as to whether it meets UK TOO. Stifle (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete local copy as duplicate of Commons file. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:USL Super League logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FootyAllOver! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

It's pretty unlikely that this logo would be copyrighted, c.f the examples here include several more complicated ones that were denied registration. Since the identical Commons file is larger, we can just delete the local one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicense to pd-logo and copy to Commons. Salavat (talk) 09:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.