The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:PureBSDeluxe.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Eric444 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Am personally unconvinced that adding the phrasing "Deluxe Edition" and a "More" stamp is sufficiently different from the standard album cover to warrant a second non-free album cover for the article per WP:NFCC #3a. Hog Farm _Talk 02:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lookitsbandana.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lookitsjoshh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned user photo, the uploader's last surviving contribution. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗plicit 03:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete user made no constructive contributions. SPA vanity account. Clear misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. Dronebogus (talk) 04:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abhishek Malhan.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SandeepKumarMeena (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Living person, not valid for WP:NFC non-free claim — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 06:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Double decker bus at Albany New Zealand 24Sept2018.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Akld guy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Tagged with ((no commons)) over incidental advertisement, but that appears to be de minimis and should be safe to move to Commons. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 09:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Won't necessarily argue this is a DM case (since the ad does take up quite a bit of space on the bus), but I'd rather think of this case by considering the incidental policy (which is included in the DM page of Commons), and some of such files had been kept on Commons/undeleted after a UDR previously (see here, here and also here for examples). Though I'm not sure whether NZ (source of origin of photo) has a copyright policy on either DM or incidental inclusion (NZ wasn't included in the DM page), so I will wait until someone can offer an explanation of the law in NZ before giving my opinion. SBS6577P (talk) 11:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Section 41 of the New Zealand copyright code contains the same regulation as Section 31 of the UK Copyright Code, clarifying explicitly that incidental inclusion in an artistic work - a term which includes photographs - does not constitute copyright infringement. Felix QW (talk) 07:12, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks for the explanation. Support moving to Commons. SBS6577P (talk) 01:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not be eligible for fair use as a free alternative exists -FASTILY 00:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bill keato.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Doctorhawkes (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The subject played from 1938-50, and since I have been unable to trace the image at the website given as a source it is unclear whether the photograph was taken pre- or post-1946, the cut-off date for URAA restoration. If no-one else finds a reason this would have been taken before 1946, it could possibly be converted to non-free use at Bill Keato. Felix QW (talk) 19:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the Western Suburbs Magpies jersey being worn [1], it would seem that this photo was taken in or about 1949. As the subject is deceased, can it be converted to the appropriate designation? Storm machine (talk) 02:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the detective work! There actually seems to be a 1939 photograph available, the third one from the bottom here.

That one would unambiguously have fallen into the public domain on time and would therefore be preferable to using this one as a non-free image. Felix QW (talk) 06:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brian Clay 1954.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sticks66 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Copyright restored in the USA by the URAA as Australian copyright did not expire before 2005. While Brian Clay seems eligible for a non-free picture, there are better ones available (see e. g. [2]); however, I assume that in the spirit of choosing the freest image possible we should choose a pre-1955 image that is at least out of copyright in its home country Australia. Felix QW (talk) 20:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.