The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD. Whpq (talk) 17:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forces of Destiny Opening Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TenTonParasol (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I'm pretty sure this logo is below the threshold of originality. It is my understanding a simple gradient isn't enough to make a work copyrightable. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Star Wars The Bad Batch logo-2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Terasail (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is a simplified version of the logo that's below the threshold of originality. I don't believe replacing this non-free logo would take away from the reader's understanding of the series because the alternate logo is used on the official site. [1] Ixfd64 (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Best of LeAnn Rimes- Remixed.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Swifty (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Virtually identical to standard cover. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:47, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as including this minor variant doesn't improve the reader's understanding. If the cover art matters, we could easily describe the remix album as the original cover, with a pink background and different title. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 06:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 17:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cherry Valentine 2020.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Meena (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cherry Valentine/archive1 (see "image review"), this fair use image is problematic and should be deleted. Is there an editor who can upload another image for the Cherry Valentine article appropriately? The entry has been nominated for FA status but will have an unillustrated infobox. Thanks! --Another Believer _(Talk) 19:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heilongjianghandcannon.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Khanate General (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is a freely-licensed image of this object already in the article, and I don't see how this non-free image which adds little to the understanding of the subject doesn't run afoul of WP:NFCC #1. Hog Farm _Talk 21:16, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, clearly, free image looks much better anyways. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 02:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per NFCC#1 as above. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 11:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.