The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garfield, My Cat. Oct 2023jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gfeissweet (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low quality photo from a non-contributor, out of scope. — Ирука¹³ 05:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added the ((delete)) template to the page.

(I uploaded it.) Gfeissweet (talk) 18:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The claim that this editor is a "non-contributor" is simply not true. This is a new account which has made improvements to articles and other good faith edits. Making such a claim against a new account is not very welcoming. The regardless of the image quality, it is in use on the editor's user page which is allowed and not out of scope. @Gfeissweet: If you really want the image deleted, you can tag it with ((db-author)), but otherwise, use of a personal picture on a user page is within policy, and is in fact done quite a lot. My opinion is to keep this image unless the uploader decides they no longer want to use it on their use page, but it is up to them. -- Whpq (talk) 19:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:French literary figures.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bob247 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The copyright of the lower left photo was restored in 1996. Collage does not have a free license in US. — Ирука¹³ 07:18, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I suspect that the somewhat confusing copyright situation of the Satre image would have to be dealt with at Commons first, rather than here. The English Wikipedia will always treat a Commons file as free unless Commons decides otherwise. Felix QW (talk) 10:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Main page screen shot 3-29-2023.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Knightoftheswords281 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused file with no encyclopedic value. — Ирука¹³ 07:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - this was a file used to illustrate a case of Main Page vandalism and would likely be helpful for future reference. — Knightoftheswords 14:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status. No prejudice to restoration if someone can produce a citation from a reliable source that explicitly describes this image as PD -FASTILY 00:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:F-86 Sabre stationed in the East.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PreserveOurHistory (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

In 1996, the photo was not in public domain in Pakistan and its copyright in the US will end 95 years after publication. — Ирука¹³ 09:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Iruka13: It's unclear, since this photo was made in 1971, and it's a government work, so crown copyright (if it's called that in Pakistan) probably applies. Several commonwealth countries, like the UK, release crown copyright into the public domain, meaning URAA doesn't apply. However, it is unclear whether this phenomenon applies to Pakistan. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable than me can comment —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 16:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By 1971, Pakistan was a Republic and had no Crown so there is no Crown copyright involved for this photo. -- Whpq (talk) 16:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: My point is that per c:Template:PD-Pakistan, this is public domain in Pakistan as a government work. However, it is unclear whether this bypasses URAA. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 13:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:KiranBOT II.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by KiranBOT (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image should have been an easy delete under G2 (test pages), but the Wikipedia admin @Bbb23 rejected by nomination for no reason, and then reverted my request for elaboration on his talkpage with a nonsense reason ("attitude"). —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 11:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep unless User:Usernamekiran wants it deleted. —Kusma (talk) 18:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Kusma: But why? test pages (incl files) are not allowed in Wikipedia —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 18:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Matr1x-101 What is the obvious indication that it is a test? ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 18:15, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @ONUnicorn: It says "test image" in the description —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 18:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  You are mistaken, and this image doesn't even satisfy the wording of G2 (it is not testing a Wikipedia function). Please stop nominating files for deletion. —Kusma (talk) 18:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @Matr1x-101: Hello. While WP:test edit does not elaborate a lot, it does say Editing tests are considered vandalism only when a user continues to make test edits despite receiving numerous warnings. As general rule of thumb, test edits out of sandbox are allowed to some extent. The edit/page in discussion was a legitimate test/experimental edit which did not harm anything else, so it is not exactly considered as "test edit" in conventional manner. Creating this on enwiki was not my first priority/option. On Marathi wikipedia (mrwiki), uploading images is not allowed anymore. There are however a lot of images, they were uploaded when it was possible in the past. Most of them were non-free images of film posters. There was a consensus to create a bot to resize these images. But as image addition/manipulation was limited only to admnins, my bot could not do it on mrwiki. For some technical reasons, it was not possible on testwiki either. So I had to do it here. The experiment was namespace sensitive, so I could not carry it out in any sandbox either. The page was not on my watchlist, so I did not realise it was nominated for deletion for the first time. I also rarely check the talkpage of my bot. If you had contacted me, I would done it myself :-) I will nominate it for speedy shortly. —usernamekiran (talk) 18:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry for wasting your time, should have started with this. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 18:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:MOL Vidi FC.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Snowflake91 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Looks to be above US TOO. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 12:41, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment if it is copyrighted, then it should be deleted, as it's not a valid fair use image when we have the team's current logo File:MOL Fehérvár FC logo.svg. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.