The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Everyone Knows That unofficial cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Microplastic Consumer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Source does not state anything about subject about the article Pyraminxsolver (talk) 03:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Upon locating the WatZatSong profile of "carl92", the original uploader of the audio snippet that this image is supposedly meant to identify, I found that this image was not uploaded along with it as its' cover. In actuality, it would seem that the image in question is merely a visual that various YouTubers have paired with the song as a background for repostings of the audio and other derivative creations, as Microplastic Consumer stated on the files' description page. Furthermore, there is almost no critical commentary regarding this image in the article, and what little does exist (1 sentence in the caption) is unsourced. Taking into account both of these factors, the image fails WP:NFCC#8 (contextual significance). -- Fhsig13 (talk) 05:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TopGearPolarSpecialGnT.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GUtt01 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Likely fails WP:NFCC#8 - I understand that the scene is discussed in the text, but the screenshot itself is not the subject of the commentary. The viewer does not have to see a glass of gin and tonic in Clarkson's hand to understand that he was seen drinking while driving. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 15:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I concur that the image likely fails WP:NFCC#8 (contextual significance), as text alone could easily convey that backlash was received as a result of Clarkson sipping a Gin & Tonic while driving a car on television. This image is most definitely unnecessary. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WeHappyFewUncleJack.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GUtt01 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

WP:NFCC#8, not the subject of sourced commentary, does not serve an encyclopedic purpose Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The article lacks sufficient sourced critical commentary connected to the image, (there is only a one sentence caption, and nothing in the body of the article itself), so I concur that it fails WP:NFCC#8 (contextual significance). -- Fhsig13 (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.