The following discussion is preserved as an archive of an unsuccessful nomination to join the Mediation Committee. Please do not modify it.

Einstein95[edit]

Einstein95 (talk · contribs) Your statement on why you want to be on the Mediation Committee. (Don't forget to sign with ~~~~.)

Questions from Committee members:

• What are the core principles of Mediation Committee mediation?
  • {to resolve issues between users Einstein95 (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)}[reply]
• Discussions during formal mediation are privileged; they cannot be used against the parties in later proceedings (e.g. RfArb/RfC). Why is that important?
  • {because disputes between users can lead to edit wars and people leaving wikipedia Einstein95 (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)}[reply]
• What prior experience do you have in resolving disputes on Wikipedia? Please provide links, and how will these experiences help you to be an effective Committee member?
  • {I have no prior experience but i am a reasonable type of person outside of wikipedia Einstein95 (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)}[reply]

Mediation Committee:

• Oppose - premature, no hard feelings. Come after having some experience. Enjoy wiki-editing. Thanks, Shyam ^(T/C) 08:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, for the reasons elucidated here. I would thank you for volunteering, though. AGK 17:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Community opinions:

Discussion and comments:

Decision of the Mediation Committee:

Not promoted per the two oppose rule.

For the Mediation Committee, Seddσn ^talk 17:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above nomination to join the Mediation Committee is preserved as a discussion archive. Please do not modify it.