The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was The result was User stated at top of page he'd tried editing the sandbox and gotten an edit conflict. Speedied as test page. KillerChihuahua^?!? 22:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite sure what to do with this. I'd say userfy but apparently the user is indef. blocked for spamming this very same material, so delete I guess. OlEnglish ^(Talk) 05:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I just realized I probably should have posted this at CfD. Can it still be moved there? -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 05:33, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The move isn't necessary, the page you have nominated is not a category. MER-C 09:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Spam, probable copyvio (note smart quotes). MER-C 09:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as not copyvio (I googled suspicious sections and found zero hits other than this in the first place). As to whether it is deleteable as CfD, no opinion. Collect (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - doesn't belong here; not an article, and not likely to become one. Robofish (talk) 08:55, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Contains blatant POV and entirely unsourced. Impossible to make it an article, especially when the creator is blocked. If it is article worthy someone else will do real research for it.- Mgm|^(talk) 10:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.