The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DARBARGALLI CHA RAJA

[edit]

I'm unsure what exactly this all caps page is talking about, but it's been abandoned in Draft space since Oct 2016 after being dropped in a single IP edit. Would need a TNT if someone wanted to pickup whatever the intended topic is. Legacypac (talk) 10:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the page makes no sense and is obviously abandoned. ww2censor (talk) 11:00, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:. Kudos to Legacypac for finding it. Almost gibberish but possibly not enough for G1. Should really have been at least PRODed. If the voting here had not already begun I would probably have deleted it G13.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:31, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks it's here because its not in AfC so G13 does not apply and AFAIK we can't Prod drafts. This shows the need for expanding CSD G13. Maybe Hoax would apply but not on a traditional sense. Legacypac (talk) 15:38, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. you're right Legacypac, G13 does indeed only apply to drafts with a AfC template. This is a good argument to get G13 to cover all Draft namespace articles, and a new CSD criterion to cover unadulterated rubbish. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:48, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sign me up for those changes. I've tried to G1 similar but had rejects. Been told if it has words G1 does not apply. Legacypac (talk) 18:04, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.