The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Mike V • Talk 19:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ensign N175

[edit]

A sub-standard draft which fails WikiProject F1 notability and has been re-submitted multiple times without issues being addressed, by an IP editor known to the F1 project. Eagleash (talk) 14:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This has gone on long enough already. The proposer is either unwilling or unable to satisfy the objections raised by various editors, and it's not the first time this IP editor has tendentiously pushed a poor draft. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete another non-notable draft from the F1 IP troll. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete declined four times at AFC for inadequate sourcing to demonstrate notability, the draft author has failed to even try to address the issue but is tendentiously resubmitting this draft with no prospect of acceptance - thus is simply wasting reviewers' time. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turn into redirect This has gone on long enough already and i think a redirect is the only option.92.21.241.4 (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The redirect suggestion is from the author of the page (under yet another IP address). If a re-direct is created he will undoubtedly re-create an article from it. Multiple re-directs have been requested in the past (via AfC) from which sub-standard articles (which also fail notability) have been created. Eagleash (talk) 11:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Will someone ever close this discussion? It has been open for 22 days now!!! T v x1 17:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It appears this wasn't properly listed at WP:MFD. I have taken care of that now. T v x1 17:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.