The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC(talk) 04:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Josef Schmalz[edit]

Draft:Josef Schmalz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Repeatedly submitted for review at AFC without any substantial changes and better sourcing. Numerous IPs have repeatedly played us for fools by posting the draft on Talk:Josef Schmalz which led to Josef Schmalz being created, just to get deleted at AFD as non-notable. Sam Sailor 01:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • In support of the deletion. It doesn't pass any of AfC's criteria. EROS message 06:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On a related note, I have somewhat more hope for Draft:Original Donauschwaben passing WP:NBAND, and Schmalz being their conductor I would expect content on him to properly live there, though not to the same extent as the standalone draft nominated here. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.