The result of the discussion was: delete. ‑Scottywong| [comment] || 17:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Has been declined four times and just submitted again with only trivial changes. It was most recently declined for copyvios, which were changed into close paraphrases by tweaking a few words here and there, with the edit comment, Fixed copy and paste problems by rewording most of the article
. The sources are mostly passing mentions and routine coverage of business announcements. The one good reference is the Patterns article from the NY Times, but one is not enough. The tone of the article probably qualifies for WP:G11, which is not surprising given that the WP:SPA author stated, in a now-deleted version of their user page, that they were, part of Ad Excellence a full service advertising agency. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)