The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep . no reason for deletion, and I urge Legacypac to move to mainspace as he suggests. DGG ( talk ) 00:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of Natural Monuments in Nepal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This draft is abandoned. As it is a list, there may be people who want to keep this. If not, this article can be deleted for G13. » Shadowowl | talk 17:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like the whole thing can be merged into one article split into zones and districts. Most of these don't seem to have articles on them. Not sure if its because they're not really notable or because no article hasn't been created yet for them. No idea whether it should be kept. Galóbtóró (talkó tuó mió) 17:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep WP:SK#1. MfD is not a forum for publicising possible interest in something coming up to G13 eligibility. If you think it should be saved, do something with it yourself. My suggestion, last time at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of Monuments in Nepal, was to offer it to an associate WikiProject. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and consider sending it and all the pages linked to mainspace. This is one of the lists for hundreds of interrelated drafts that were deleted G13 and restored recently. They are all being moved to mainspaceLegacypac (talk) 21:48, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.