The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was both speedy deleted per G13. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lola T100

[edit]

Two drafts that keep getting submitted for review without any attempts being made to address the issues. Regardless, the subjects of these drafts fail our notability guidelines and are therefore unsuitable for a stand-alone article. In addition to being deleted, I recommend them being salted because the creator has the habit of swiftly recreating work of theirs that gets deleted. T v x1 21:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as being tendentiously resubmitted. There have been other Lola drafts by this unregistered editor. Salting should be considered, but they will then move on to other Lolas. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Both these cars fail WikiProject F1 notability and, in addition the drafts have been re-submitted several times without the issues noted on review being fixed. Salting could be considered... the IP editor has created several poor drafts recently for a variety of F1 cars which lack notability; (some have been accepted). He will no doubt continue to do so and would recreate these drafts if not salted. Eagleash (talk) 23:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update Both drafts have now been found to be copy-vios and have been tagged as such for speedy deletion. Eagleash (talk) 12:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.